From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/lib/api: Check nonfilterable in fdarray__filter()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:51:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alFpTwZSuYR6eh0u@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710200150.11FE71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 08:01:49PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] If `realloc` for `fda->priv` fails in `fdarray__grow()`, a dangling pointer is left in `fda->entries`, leading to a double-free during error cleanup.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] tools/lib/api: Check nonfilterable in fdarray__filter() ---
> commit f87f1b3c291ca03e96598f96697566a328711de3
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> tools/lib/api: Check nonfilterable in fdarray__filter()
>
> IIUC fdarray__filter() should check filterable events only and leave
> non-filterable events to be handled outside. The recent change to set
> fd to -1 made perf record test stuck forever. Adding the check the flag
> fixes the problem for me.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> > index ffe8272af59b2..b4570e4981492 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ int fdarray__filter(struct fdarray *fda, short revents,
> > for (fd = 0; fd < fda->nr; ++fd) {
> > if (!fda->entries[fd].events)
> > continue;
> > + if (fda->priv[fd].flags & fdarray_flag__nonfilterable)
> > + continue;
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but while looking at this file I noticed a
> potential double-free in fdarray__grow() during error handling.
I'll handle this in a separate patch.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> If the realloc for fda->entries succeeds but the realloc for fda->priv
> fails, the error path frees the newly allocated entries:
>
> tools/lib/api/fd/array.c:fdarray__grow() {
> ...
> struct pollfd *entries = realloc(fda->entries, size);
>
> if (entries == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> priv = realloc(fda->priv, psize);
> if (priv == NULL) {
> free(entries);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> However, fda->entries is neither updated to point to the new entries block
> nor cleared to NULL. If realloc moved the allocation to a new block, the
> old fda->entries pointer is now freed memory.
>
> When fdarray__exit() is later called to clean up, it executes
> free(fda->entries), which would trigger a double-free on that old pointer.
>
> Would it be better to clear fda->entries to NULL here, or avoid modifying
> the struct state until both allocations succeed?
>
> [ ... ]
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710194222.1788638-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 19:42 [PATCH] tools/lib/api: Check nonfilterable in fdarray__filter() Namhyung Kim
2026-07-10 20:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 21:51 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alFpTwZSuYR6eh0u@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox