From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Do not open cgroups for BPF counters
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:50:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alGFKjj1oorszo3V@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708201434.5C5831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 08:14:33PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Fallback from BPF counter mode to standard cgroup mode leaves cgroup file descriptors uninitialized (-1), causing standard perf event opening to fail with -EBADF.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] perf stat: Do not open cgroups for BPF counters ---
> commit 510c63ce03b2362940d1f693b45d5faa86cf3bc1
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> perf stat: Do not open cgroups for BPF counters
>
> This commit prevents opening and keeping file descriptors for cgroups
> when using the --bpf-counters and --for-each-cgroup options. BPF mode
> uses a set of shared events and compares cgroup-IDs, so it doesn't need
> individual cgroup file descriptors.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -2874,7 +2874,8 @@ int cmd_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (evlist__expand_cgroup(evsel_list, stat_config.cgroup_list, true) < 0) {
> > + if (evlist__expand_cgroup(evsel_list, stat_config.cgroup_list,
> > + !target.use_bpf) < 0) {
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this break the fallback path when we exceed BPERF_CGROUP__MAX_EVENTS?
>
> Later in cmd_stat(), we have a fallback that disables BPF counters if there
> are too many events:
>
> if (target.use_bpf && nr_cgroups &&
> (evsel_list->core.nr_entries / nr_cgroups) > BPERF_CGROUP__MAX_EVENTS) {
> pr_warning("Disabling BPF counters due to more events...");
> target.use_bpf = false;
> }
>
> If this fallback is triggered, target.use_bpf becomes false, but the cgroups
> were already expanded with !target.use_bpf (which was false at the time),
> leaving the cgroup file descriptors uninitialized (-1).
I think it's a false alarm. The evlist__expand_cgroup() is only used if
stat_config.cgroup_list is set and then it should not have nr_cgroups.
There's a check for that right before the call to the function.
So in that case, it cannot pass the if condition below and never set to
target.use_bpf to false.
Thanks,
Namhyung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:04 [PATCH] perf stat: Do not open cgroups for BPF counters Namhyung Kim
2026-07-08 20:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 23:50 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alGFKjj1oorszo3V@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox