Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix bpf test sample mismatch reporting

[Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>]

Hi Arnaldo, please have a look.
This is still valid.
Thanks.
Michael

On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, Michael Petlan wrote:
> When the expected sample count in the condition changed, the message
> needs to be changed too, otherwise we'll get:
> 
>   0x1001f2091d8: mmap mask[0]:
>   BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 56 samples
> 
> Fixes: 4b04e0decd25 ("perf test: Fix basic bpf filtering test")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
> index dbf5f5215abe..fa03ff0dc083 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void),
>  	}
>  
>  	if (count != expect * evlist->core.nr_entries) {
> -		pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count);
> +		pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect * evlist->core.nr_entries, count);
>  		goto out_delete_evlist;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 
>