From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A634634EF1F for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 22:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791240449; cv=none; b=EBBq5eRZAkqQWG5tF/qm2VJ2Q0OwODflRI9g1gZx8BDMXRFHntMAjmvOtHP/IrDep1n+KAyObsrw7HeHbVwMJm5DwAPHnQjmrSZpKSiwKJofPG1Kl2PAcUovHpLM2L4Eb4z/bxYdLeua2FujM4nZfiU7EczXZi1k3ppYcwiA+DM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791240449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TqLCr9kvEGrfBgVQ9P+NLQD6g59gb1Ofp/EGHKzCnZo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oerb8IMpr+ec5Jy+8nEHz9R0NrY194of8gtx88xagsVWa+SU9+Hh1n7LWrmT2nRqlLSOCuBcrdYotcwbi00WRjsxWwaJ4U9X8U39BKiSG8DPOLArrUAXx9zYfy9zDVvjGoO5uFd72DW6tiIc7xo6AjC8KW7n/70VIaRgH4O/rSU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XgazwCB4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XgazwCB4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A72761F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 22:47:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791240446; bh=OtnojGfS9dbZW5QOHF6ThZuMNFGwmDszlMzCTPYmsX8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=XgazwCB4z5xTdqLWnaqbG0nrzwjgIlckacBwHzaC7RPPcDFfkljeSEXZ3H52fLeDD QAY5OOwD3OcG+TD3dO8DFrAUiZ8LM+Zig2kOQ7dn8gWpV8v+biK68DS+Vxhu8V+yTq eSlrqnkVPQU4JDWDbPcukAZu+g+UhN1GNBPVK0/gd59CxFXFrPThk7Lc27Jl1IFNmv 5szvFKqsTFdGQbX/iKpMXLzoFFA2KaMaL5xHIirv+LcGG31DJWfphwch2X5a1uuOFf JxLYAa5/PTxtXF87jyZhtSo2/KYndOhfI7wdIwqgP09HtLeT+ff2/0KeynamUBErJA HhDhjhdFiX/QQ== Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 15:47:25 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Michael Petlan Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf test attr: Fix and re-enable the test Message-ID: References: <20260924223027.799654-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260924223027.799654-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> Hello, On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:30:25AM +0200, Michael Petlan wrote: > Hello all, > > I have noticed that a testcase formerly known as "Setup struct perf_event_attr", > later renamed to "Perf attribute expectations test" has been disabled by > accident during the move. > > That also probably led to forgetting to update the struct size, which is now > fixed by the second patch. > > Michael > > > Michael Petlan (2): > perf test attr: Propagate the return value from the test to the > wrapper > perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events The "Fixes" tag format is a bit different, but otherwise Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Thanks, Namhyung