From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D2742CAF6 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791292420; cv=none; b=BJgs9U2sNXXk+v9M8x98UfilxihotsSHqbGpTfX4jYiirkAI4WDM8TTnq72OIgp5HCJdLU8aWJLMTyWAqeSQeOQXsw7mrMPPF96GQE+hf9yr1df/y41rEFr0nWNqe37zNpLlhV27omfUPdLf591VPwVcyV2NwrEk44Y+ynKGp3E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791292420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lFO2ncSddcpojTzsCQnp4OEuNYflGaK4r/Q6mTwyAJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LK9Wo8skvFfnmQ5xApeE7BQ8ZjaG2FVyOD8+m9kCCnAeXV1KqwdKxTtEX4ZpV65Bds2z2GHLRDcYjAbIzrTtc1A/PnyGHx6sKQAyV+8kqIAwQu1SJSBY2Daj5jJpRsq+eUjnRWshTd5qDmFoOKX0yxHF7ePw50/YvTjkLIyc2e0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N0fzFVRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N0fzFVRT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48E131F000FF; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 13:13:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791292419; bh=Q67+RGDmNTFBXvF/YkPI0aDuiqbmnMROtxpPFvOhU68=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=N0fzFVRTLuykwduiyDLMtsm6xx3CwaM9M7DLZ9SmOISQgcpFqLjbNuEP9C9XwuFzj KshJK+faGx/P0lWsVP1QrmyvHFoPc4sULs91TdI+vVdql3Qp9R+pGjYgLKJcMZrxck XPJ+6Iewuy4QRLDV+TzLKZLiOfbuC73N7xOB6LUHTFuBgkZKqjwSv1kdNipxSr6toB lG+roZctroipPlTfWp5pBxAf0pD1820t4Gdl1qyD5Qe71MfG6ZrBo7Id8947Ul6RVp vUKfxoOMEAIen+z5zygpEPN2ir2ogLcreeAceb/5Ezputp67N8zWmMZPxqam3RZZBP kXUDHe+sG8rVg== Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:13:36 +0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Michael Petlan , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf test attr: Fix and re-enable the test Message-ID: References: <20260924223027.799654-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:30:25AM +0200, Michael Petlan wrote: > > I have noticed that a testcase formerly known as "Setup struct perf_event_attr", > > later renamed to "Perf attribute expectations test" has been disabled by > > accident during the move. > > That also probably led to forgetting to update the struct size, which is now > > fixed by the second patch. > > Michael Petlan (2): > > perf test attr: Propagate the return value from the test to the > > wrapper > > perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events > The "Fixes" tag format is a bit different, but otherwise I fixed the Fixes tags. > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Thanks, applied both patches, - Arnaldo