Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:26:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asUTODqjJUH5MwSE@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asT4xQW9Vy492Yyl@x2>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 03:33:57PM +0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> The test is still failing tho, for some other reason:
 
> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/attr/test-record-graph-default'
> test limitation '!aarch64'
> excluded architecture list ['aarch64']
> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/attr/test-record-graph-default-aarch64'
> test limitation 'aarch64'
> skipped [x86_64] '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/attr/test-record-graph-default-aarch64'
> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf'
> expected sample_type=45359, got 12583
> FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/shell/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf' - match failure
> ---- end(-1) ----
>  82: Perf attribute expectations test                                                                       : FAILED!

Some fixes for problems undetected because of the lack of error
propagation:

⬢ [acme@tb-x2-perf perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -5
027108ff3952e8ae (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests
12d947c0d8e7aac6 perf test attr: Fix record dwarf sample_type expectation
cec590f3de003895 perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events
04a0a19ede01e771 perf test attr: Propagate the return value from the test to the wrapper
1dc462fc21490767 (perf-tools-next.korg/tmp.perf-tools-next, perf-tools-next.korg/perf-tools-next, five/perf-tools-next, acme.korg/tmp.perf-tools-next, acme.korg/perf-tools-next) perf test: Add a test for perf timechart --tui
⬢ [acme@tb-x2-perf perf-tools-next]$

Still working to see all gets fixed and that test passes again.

- Arnado

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 22:30 [PATCH 0/2] perf test attr: Fix and re-enable the test Michael Petlan
2026-09-24 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf test attr: Propagate the return value from the test to the wrapper Michael Petlan
2026-09-24 22:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events Michael Petlan
2026-09-24 22:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 13:33   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 15:26     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-10-05 22:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf test attr: Fix and re-enable the test Namhyung Kim
2026-10-06 13:13   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asUTODqjJUH5MwSE@x2 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox