Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	 "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Motin <alexander.motin@truenas.com>,
	Ameer Hamza <ameer.hamza@truenas.com>,
	 "Caleb St. John" <caleb.stjohn@truenas.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: track the perf mlock gift separately
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:09:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atCYFpm63elRyuw7@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015075817.GO2009045@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 09:58:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 05:29:07PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:

> > Resolve the issue by simply giving perf its own field separate from the
> > rest.
>
> So I'm a little confused by all this -- perf introduced this field,
> others jumped on and shit broke, so we fix perf instead of the others?

Yeah I think the blame really lies with the later users, and that send a trend
that led to further confusion (including myself, mea culpa!)

> Anyway, patch seems straight forward enough; and you added comment to
> the fields, which I suppose does clarify things some.
>
> I'll take it. Thanks!

Thanks, much appreciated! :)

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-03 16:29 [PATCH] perf/core: track the perf mlock gift separately Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-03 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15  7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-15  9:09   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-10-15  9:27     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-10-15 10:40       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atCYFpm63elRyuw7@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.motin@truenas.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ameer.hamza@truenas.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=caleb.stjohn@truenas.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox