From: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/7] Introduce perf check subcommand
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:39:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1d59ea7-dc82-4bd6-8f11-fd35282a4fed@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240718085957.550858-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com>
Linux-ci build test results for all patches (all green, except some
g5_defconfig in kernel+qemu, which is red irrespective of this series):
https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux-ci/actions
Thanks,
Aditya Gupta
On 18/07/24 14:29, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> The Problem
> ===========
>
> Currently the presence of a feature is checked with a combination of
> perf version --build-options and greps, such as:
>
> perf version --build-options | grep " on .* HAVE_FEATURE"
>
> This relies on the output of perf version, and is a common pattern in tests.
>
> Proposed solution
> =================
>
> As suggested by contributors in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/ZMPWk5K63tadmDlU@kernel.org/
>
> Introduce a subcommand "perf check feature", with which
> scripts can test for presence of a feature or multiple features, such as:
>
> perf check feature HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT (feature macro)
>
> or
>
> perf check feature libtraceevent (feature name)
>
> or
>
> perf check feature LibTraceEvent (case-insensitive)
>
> or
>
> perf check feature libtraceevent,bpf (multiple features)
>
> The usage of "perf version --build-options | grep" has been replaced in two
> tests, with "perf check feature" command
>
> Also, to not duplicate the same feature list at multiple places, a new global
> 'supported_features' array has been introduced in builtin.h, so both commands
> 'perf check feature' and 'perf version --build-options' use the same array
>
> 'supported_features' feature is an array of 'struct feature_support', which
> also has the name of the feature, macro used to test it's presence, and a
> is_builtin member, which will be 0 if feature not built-in, and 1 if built-in
>
> Architectures Tested
> ====================
> * x86_64
> * ppc64le
>
> Commands ran for testing (Fedora & RHEL):
>
> sudo dnf install -y libtraceevent-devel
> make clean
> make -j$(nproc)
> ./perf check feature libtraceevent,bpf; echo Return Code: $?
> ./perf check feature libtraceevent; echo Return Code: $?
>
> sudo ./perf test -v "task-analyzer"
> sudo ./perf test -v "probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping"
> sudo ./perf test -v "Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames"
>
> sudo dnf remove -y libtraceevent-devel
> make clean
> make NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 -j$(nproc)
> ./perf check feature libtraceevent,bpf; echo Return Code: $?
> ./perf check feature libtraceevent; echo Return Code: $?
>
> sudo ./perf test -v "task-analyzer"
> sudo ./perf test -v "probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping"
> sudo ./perf test -v "Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames"
>
> Git tree
> ========
>
> Git tree with this patch series applied for testing:
> https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux/tree/perf-check-feature-v13
>
> Changelog
> =========
>
> v13:
> + patch #1: add fix for parse_options_subcommand not setting usage string
> + patch #2: if unknown feature name passed, print "please use 'perf version
> --build-options' to see which ones are available"
> + patch #6: fix inconsistency in feature names (dwarf-unwind-support & get_cpuid)
> + patch #7: add more features to feature_list
>
> v12
> + patch #1: fix comment to mention argv[0] instead of argv[1]
> + patch #2: fix alignment
>
> v11
> + patch #1: fix build error due to const *const instead of const*
>
> v10
> + patch #1: use 'strdup' instead of 'malloc+memcpy'
> + patch #1: replace '-q' with '--quiet' in doc
> + patch #1: add usage for perf check
>
> V9
> + make 'feature' a subcommand instead of an option
> + make feature name/macro check case-insensitive
> + rename 'FEATURE_SUPPORT' as 'FEATURE_STATUS'
> + rebase on upstream perf-tools-next
>
> V8
> + handle return value of 'malloc' in patch #1
> + fix error due to strncpy depending on source string's length
>
> V7
> + modified patch #1 to fix compile issue, and add feature to allow
> multiple comma-separated features
>
> V6
> + rebased to perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next
> + modified patch #1 to include FEATURE_SUPPORT("bpf_skeletons", HAVE_BPF_SKEL)
>
> V5
> + invert return value of 'has_support', but return value of perf check --feature
> according to shell convention
>
> V4
> + invert return value of perf check --feature
>
> V3
> + simplified has_support code in builtin-check.c (patch #1)
> + modified patch #3 and patch #4 according to change in return value in patch #1
>
> V2
> + improved the patch series with suggestions from Namhyung
> + fix incorrect return value, added -q option, and moved array definition to
> perf-check.c
>
> V1
> + changed subcommand name to 'perf check --feature'
> + added documentation for perf check
> + support both macro (eg. HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT), and name (eg. libtraceevent) as
> input to 'perf check --feature'
> + change subject and descriptions of all patch mentioning perf check instead of
> perf build
>
> V0: Previous patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230825061125.24312-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Aditya Gupta (6):
> tools/lib/subcmd: Don't free the usage string
> perf check: Introduce 'check' subcommand
> perf version: Update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array
> tools/perf/tests: Update test_task_analyzer.sh to use perf check
> feature
> perf: Fix inconsistencies in feature names
> perf: Add more features to supported_features list
>
> Athira Rajeev (1):
> tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check
> feature
>
> tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c | 8 +-
> tools/perf/Build | 1 +
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt | 106 +++++++++
> tools/perf/builtin-check.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c | 2 +
> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c | 3 +
> tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 3 +
> tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 3 +
> tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 3 +
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 3 +
> tools/perf/builtin-version.c | 43 +---
> tools/perf/builtin.h | 17 ++
> tools/perf/perf.c | 1 +
> .../perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh | 4 +-
> .../shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 5 +-
> .../shell/record+script_probe_vfs_getname.sh | 5 +-
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 +-
> 17 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-check.txt
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/builtin-check.c
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 8:59 [PATCH v13 0/7] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] tools/lib/subcmd: Don't free the usage string Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 9:07 ` Aditya Gupta
2024-07-26 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-07-28 19:58 ` Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] perf check: Introduce 'check' subcommand Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] perf version: Update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] tools/perf/tests: Update test_task_analyzer.sh to use perf check feature Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script " Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] perf: Fix inconsistencies in feature names Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 8:59 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] perf: Add more features to supported_features list Aditya Gupta
2024-07-18 9:09 ` Aditya Gupta [this message]
2024-09-03 15:30 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] Introduce perf check subcommand Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-04 5:41 ` Aditya Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1d59ea7-dc82-4bd6-8f11-fd35282a4fed@linux.ibm.com \
--to=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).