From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: perf probe and bitfields Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:28:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: <52f06b83-1065-dc88-756e-7f8fffc5c21e@gmail.com> <20180126065656.GD22737@sejong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:40845 "EHLO mail-pf0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752245AbeAZQ25 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:28:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i66so574401pfd.7 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:28:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180126065656.GD22737@sejong> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Perf Users , kernel-team@lge.com On 1/25/18 11:56 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi David, > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:43:50AM -0800, David Ahern wrote: >> Hi Arnaldo / Masami: >> >> Are there known issues / limitations with perf probe and bitfields? >> >> Here's an example: pkt_type is a bitfield in sk_buff. When I put a probe >> in arp_rcv to examine the pkt_type value: >> >> $ perf probe 'arp_rcv ptype=skb->pkt_type dev=dev->name:string' > > Bitfield type takes 3 parameters according to the Doc/perf-probe.txt. > Maybe it's like 'ptype=skb->pkt_type:b3@0/8' ? missed that. Thanks, Namyhung.