Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix Tool PMU test segfault

["Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>]

On 2025-02-12 11:38 a.m., James Clark wrote:
> tool_pmu__event_to_str() now handles skipped events by returning NULL,
> so it's wrong to re-check for a skip on the resulting string. Calling
> tool_pmu__skip_event() with a NULL string results in a segfault so
> remove the unnecessary skip to fix it:
> 
>   $ perf test -vv "parsing with PMU name"
> 
>   12.2: Parsing with PMU name:
>   ...
>   ---- unexpected signal (11) ----
>   12.2: Parsing with PMU name         : FAILED!
> 

Oops, right. Thanks for the fix.

Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan

> Fixes: ee8aef2d2321 ("perf tools: Add skip check in tool_pmu__event_to_str()")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> --->  tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> index 187942b749b7..1e900ef92e37 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static int do_test(enum tool_pmu_event ev, bool with_pmu)
>  	parse_events_error__init(&err);
>  	ret = parse_events(evlist, str, &err);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		if (tool_pmu__skip_event(tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev))) {
> +		if (!tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev)) {
>  			ret = TEST_OK;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int do_test(enum tool_pmu_event ev, bool with_pmu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!found && !tool_pmu__skip_event(tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev))) {
> +	if (!found && tool_pmu__event_to_str(ev)) {
>  		pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d Didn't find tool event '%s' in parsed evsels\n",
>  			 __FILE__, __LINE__, str);
>  		ret = TEST_FAIL;