From: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Likhitha Korrapati <likhitha@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/lib/perf: Fix -Werror=alloc-size-larger-than in cpumap.c
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:38:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baad9d65-07b1-4a19-aea6-5ba5d60da98e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E58C5DCA-5F52-4B61-A816-DE932BA40FDA@linux.ibm.com>
On 07/04/25 12:10 am, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>> On 6 Apr 2025, at 10:04 PM, Likhitha Korrapati <likhitha@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> perf build break observed when using gcc 13-3 (FC39 ppc64le)
>> with the following error.
>>
>> cpumap.c: In function 'perf_cpu_map__merge':
>> cpumap.c:414:20: error: argument 1 range [18446744069414584320, 18446744073709551614] exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=alloc-size-larger-than=]
>> 414 | tmp_cpus = malloc(tmp_len * sizeof(struct perf_cpu));
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from cpumap.c:4:
>> /usr/include/stdlib.h:672:14: note: in a call to allocation function 'malloc' declared here
>> 672 | extern void *malloc (size_t __size) __THROW __attribute_malloc__
>> | ^~~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> Error happens to be only in gcc13-3 and not in latest gcc 14.
>> Even though git-bisect pointed bad commit as:
>> 'commit f5b07010c13c ("libperf: Don't remove -g when EXTRA_CFLAGS are used")',
>> issue is with tmp_len being "int". It holds number of cpus and making
>> it "unsigned int" fixes the issues.
>>
>> After the fix:
>>
>> CC util/pmu-flex.o
>> CC util/expr-flex.o
>> LD util/perf-util-in.o
>> LD perf-util-in.o
>> AR libperf-util.a
>> LINK perf
>> GEN python/perf.cpython-312-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.so
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Likhitha Korrapati <likhitha@linux.ibm.com>
> Looks good to me
>
> Reviewed-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Tested this patch on perf-tools-next repo, and this patch fixes the issue.
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Regards,
Venkat.
>
> Thanks
> Athira
>> ---
>> tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> index 4454a5987570..c7c784e18225 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ bool perf_cpu_map__is_subset(const struct perf_cpu_map *a, const struct perf_cpu
>> int perf_cpu_map__merge(struct perf_cpu_map **orig, struct perf_cpu_map *other)
>> {
>> struct perf_cpu *tmp_cpus;
>> - int tmp_len;
>> + unsigned int tmp_len;
>> int i, j, k;
>> struct perf_cpu_map *merged;
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-06 16:34 [PATCH] tools/lib/perf: Fix -Werror=alloc-size-larger-than in cpumap.c Likhitha Korrapati
2025-04-06 18:40 ` Athira Rajeev
2025-04-07 12:08 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote [this message]
2025-04-14 1:38 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2025-04-25 14:49 ` Athira Rajeev
2025-04-25 17:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-04-29 5:11 ` Likhitha Korrapati
2025-05-02 7:44 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2025-05-13 21:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-05-13 22:12 ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-13 22:36 ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-21 13:03 ` Likhitha Korrapati
2025-05-21 15:45 ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-21 17:28 ` Likhitha Korrapati
2025-05-21 17:39 ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-02 9:05 ` Likhitha Korrapati
2025-04-07 5:39 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baad9d65-07b1-4a19-aea6-5ba5d60da98e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=likhitha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).