From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf auxtrace: Iterate all AUX events when finish reading
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:40:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb8e5202-bffa-4cd6-b49c-6372d51b405b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240725064620.1651819-2-leo.yan@arm.com>
On 25/07/24 09:46, Leo Yan wrote:
> When finished to read AUX trace data from mmaped buffer, based on the
Here and elsewhere 'mmapped' is more common than 'mmaped' so maybe:
mmaped -> mmapped
> AUX buffer index the core layer needs to search the corresponding PMU
> event and re-enable it to continue tracing.
>
> However, current code only searches the first AUX event. It misses to
> search other enabled AUX events, thus, it returns failure if the buffer
> index does not belong to the first AUX event.
>
> This patch extends the auxtrace_record__read_finish() function to
> search for every enabled AUX events, so all the mmaped buffer indexes
> can be covered.
Looking at this again, a couple more things came to mind - see below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> index b99e72f7da88..61835a6a9ea3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> @@ -670,18 +670,33 @@ static int evlist__enable_event_idx(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel *evsel,
> int auxtrace_record__read_finish(struct auxtrace_record *itr, int idx)
> {
> struct evsel *evsel;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!itr->evlist || !itr->pmu)
> + if (!itr->evlist)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> evlist__for_each_entry(itr->evlist, evsel) {
> - if (evsel->core.attr.type == itr->pmu->type) {
> + if (evsel__is_aux_event(evsel)) {
> if (evsel->disabled)
> - return 0;
> - return evlist__enable_event_idx(itr->evlist, evsel, idx);
> + continue;
That will make the evsel->disabled case an error, which
might be a problem. Possibly the event can be disabled
(e.g. via control fifo) but still have data to read out.
> + /*
> + * Multiple AUX events might be opened in a session.
> + * Bail out for success case as the AUX event has been
> + * found and enabled, otherwise, continue to check if
> + * the next AUX event can cover the mmaped buffer with
> + * 'idx'.
> + */
Thinking about this some more, raised some questions:
How do we know there is only one AUX event per mmap? They
would have to be on different CPUs for that to be true?
And wouldn't --per-thread have all AUX events in every mmap?
> + ret = evlist__enable_event_idx(itr->evlist, evsel, idx);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + return ret;
> }
> }
> - return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Failed to find an event for the buffer 'idx' */
> + if (ret < 0)
> + pr_err("Failed to enable event (idx=%d): %d\n", idx, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 6:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf auxtrace: Support multiple AUX events Leo Yan
2024-07-25 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf auxtrace: Iterate all AUX events when finish reading Leo Yan
2024-07-25 15:40 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-07-29 8:48 ` Leo Yan
2024-07-30 19:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-07-25 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf auxtrace: Remove unused 'pmu' pointer from struct auxtrace_record Leo Yan
2024-07-25 15:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-07-25 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf arm-spe: Extract evsel setting up Leo Yan
2024-07-25 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf arm-spe: Support multiple Arm SPE events Leo Yan
2024-07-25 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf auxtrace: Support multiple AUX events Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb8e5202-bffa-4cd6-b49c-6372d51b405b@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).