From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Do not treat -1 die_id as error during UBOX scan
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:13:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c53a7b98-14e0-41ff-89d8-5cb6f7d96434@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330212444.117325-4-zide.chen@intel.com>
On 3/31/2026 5:24 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> In snbep_pci2phy_map_init(), in the nr_node_ids > 8 path,
> uncore_device_to_die() may return -1 when all CPUs associated
> with the UBOX device are offline.
>
> Remove the WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1) check for two reasons:
>
> - The current code breaks out of the loop. This is incorrect because
> pci_get_device() does not guarantee iteration in domain or bus order,
> so additional UBOX devices may be skipped during the scan.
>
> - Returning -EINVAL is incorrect, since marking offline buses with
> die_id == -1 is expected and should not be treated as an error.
>
> Fixes: 9a7832ce3d92 ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: With > 8 nodes, get pci bus die id from NUMA info")
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - Fix the commit message to note that spr_update_device_location() is
> used by EMR, not GNR.
> - Rewrite the commit message for clarity.
> - Add a Tested-by tag.
>
> V5:
> - Removed unused die_id (Dapeng).
>
> V6:
> - Move the spr_update_device_location() change to a separate patch.
> - Update the comit message and title to reflect the reduced scope of
> this patch.
> - Remove Tested-by since the code has changed.
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index 9b51883fd6fd..8ee06d4659bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ static int topology_gidnid_map(int nodeid, u32 gidnid)
> static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid, int nodeid_loc, int idmap_loc, bool reverse)
> {
> struct pci_dev *ubox_dev = NULL;
> - int i, bus, nodeid, segment, die_id;
> + int i, bus, nodeid, segment;
> struct pci2phy_map *map;
> int err = 0;
> u32 config = 0;
> @@ -1458,14 +1458,9 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid, int nodeid_loc, int idmap_loc, bool
> break;
> }
>
> - map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id = uncore_device_to_die(ubox_dev);
> + map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = uncore_device_to_die(ubox_dev);
>
> raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> -
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1)) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> - }
> }
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 21:24 [PATCH V6 0/5] Miscellaneous Intel uncore patches Zide Chen
2026-03-30 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix iounmap() leak on global_init failure Zide Chen
2026-03-30 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Skip discovery table for offline dies Zide Chen
2026-03-30 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Do not treat -1 die_id as error during UBOX scan Zide Chen
2026-03-31 1:13 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-03-30 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PMON enumeration with NUMA disabled Zide Chen
2026-03-31 1:26 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-01 20:25 ` Chen, Zide
2026-04-02 2:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-02 21:31 ` Chen, Zide
2026-04-03 0:58 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-30 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove extra double quote mark Zide Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c53a7b98-14e0-41ff-89d8-5cb6f7d96434@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox