From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND Patch 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Only check GP counters for PEBS constraints validation
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:28:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c718111d-b836-4e03-b42c-5b86d409b6bc@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228053320.140406-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Hi Peter,
Could you please review and merge this change? This change suppose to be
low risky. Without this change, the dynamic constraints check would trigger
false positive on DMR/NVL. Thanks.
On 2/28/2026 1:33 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> It's good enough to only check GP counters for PEBS constraints
> validation since constraints overlap can only happen on GP counters.
>
> Besides opportunistically refine the code style and use pr_warn() to
> replace pr_info() as the message itself is a warning message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index cf3a4fe06ff2..4768236c054b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -5770,7 +5770,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_check_dyn_constr(struct event_constraint *constr,
> }
>
> if (check_fail) {
> - pr_info("The two events 0x%llx and 0x%llx may not be "
> + pr_warn("The two events 0x%llx and 0x%llx may not be "
> "fully scheduled under some circumstances as "
> "%s.\n",
> c1->code, c2->code, dyn_constr_type_name[type]);
> @@ -5783,6 +5783,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_dyn_constr(struct pmu *pmu,
> struct event_constraint *constr,
> u64 cntr_mask)
> {
> + u64 gp_mask = GENMASK_ULL(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC - 1, 0);
> enum dyn_constr_type i;
> u64 mask;
>
> @@ -5797,20 +5798,25 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_dyn_constr(struct pmu *pmu,
> mask = x86_pmu.lbr_counters;
> break;
> case DYN_CONSTR_ACR_CNTR:
> - mask = hybrid(pmu, acr_cntr_mask64) & GENMASK_ULL(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC - 1, 0);
> + mask = hybrid(pmu, acr_cntr_mask64) & gp_mask;
> break;
> case DYN_CONSTR_ACR_CAUSE:
> - if (hybrid(pmu, acr_cntr_mask64) == hybrid(pmu, acr_cause_mask64))
> + if (hybrid(pmu, acr_cntr_mask64) ==
> + hybrid(pmu, acr_cause_mask64))
> continue;
> - mask = hybrid(pmu, acr_cause_mask64) & GENMASK_ULL(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC - 1, 0);
> + mask = hybrid(pmu, acr_cause_mask64) & gp_mask;
> break;
> case DYN_CONSTR_PEBS:
> - if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs)
> - mask = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).counters;
> + if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
> + mask = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).counters &
> + gp_mask;
> + }
> break;
> case DYN_CONSTR_PDIST:
> - if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs)
> - mask = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).pdists;
> + if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
> + mask = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).pdists &
> + gp_mask;
> + }
> break;
> default:
> pr_warn("Unsupported dynamic constraint type %d\n", i);
>
> base-commit: 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 5:33 [RESEND Patch 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Only check GP counters for PEBS constraints validation Dapeng Mi
2026-02-28 5:33 ` [RESEND Patch 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Add missing branch counters constraint apply Dapeng Mi
2026-03-07 1:27 ` Chen, Zide
2026-03-11 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 2:02 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-11 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 2:31 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 6:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 6:52 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-07 1:27 ` [RESEND Patch 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Only check GP counters for PEBS constraints validation Chen, Zide
2026-03-12 8:28 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-03-12 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 8:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c718111d-b836-4e03-b42c-5b86d409b6bc@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox