linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: mark.barnett@arm.com
Cc: ben.gainey@arm.com, deepak.surti@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	will@kernel.org, james.clark@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:47:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca8de228-68c2-4b2c-bb58-30f275afc49e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106120156.227273-1-mark.barnett@arm.com>



On 06/01/2025 12:01 pm, mark.barnett@arm.com wrote:
> From: Mark Barnett <mark.barnett@arm.com>
> 
> This patch introduces the concept of an alternating sample rate to perf
> core and provides the necessary basic changes in the tools to activate
> that option.
> 

[...]

> Changes since v1:
>   - Rebased onto perf-tools-next, as per request from Ian Rogers.
>   - Removed unnecessary code that truncated period_left to 0 and restarted
>     the PMU.
>   - Renamed variables to use the shorter 'alt_period' instead of
>     'alterantive_period'.
>   - Added patch #5 that addresses an issue in the x86 and PowerPC drivers that
>     caused the opposite period to be reported in the sample record.
>     

It sounds like it would be better if patch 5 comes first otherwise the 
feature is introduced as broken.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-22 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics mark.barnett
2025-01-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: Allow periodic events to alternate between two sample periods mark.barnett
2025-01-21 13:01   ` Leo Yan
2025-03-07 20:28     ` Mark Barnett
2025-03-10 10:55       ` Leo Yan
2025-01-31 18:44   ` Rob Herring
2025-02-07 19:18     ` Mark Barnett
2025-01-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf: Allow adding fixed random jitter to the alternate sampling period mark.barnett
2025-01-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tools/perf: Modify event parser to support alt-period term mark.barnett
2025-01-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tools/perf: Modify event parser to support alt-period-jitter term mark.barnett
2025-01-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf: Record sample last_period before updating mark.barnett
2025-01-21 17:22   ` Leo Yan
2025-01-22  5:03   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-22 16:47 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-02-07 19:23   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics Mark Barnett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca8de228-68c2-4b2c-bb58-30f275afc49e@linaro.org \
    --to=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben.gainey@arm.com \
    --cc=deepak.surti@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.barnett@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).