From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
song@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next RFC 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:36:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb3b054b-3c21-4941-800c-4519cae9ce31@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cf98c31-4475-4e4a-8ce0-bc9c62922313@linux.dev>
在 2025/10/14 05:37, Yonghong Song 写道:
>
>
> On 10/13/25 1:41 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 01:47:19AM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
>>> Background
>>> ==========
>>> Alexei noted we should use preempt_disable to protect get_perf_callchain
>>> in bpf stackmap.
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQ+s8B7-fvR1TNO-
>>> bniSyKv57cH_ihRszmZV7pQDyV=VDQ@mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> A previous patch was submitted to attempt fixing this issue. And Andrii
>>> suggested teach get_perf_callchain to let us pass that buffer
>>> directly to
>>> avoid that unnecessary copy.
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250926153952.1661146-1-
>>> chen.dylane@linux.dev
>>>
>>> Proposed Solution
>>> =================
>>> Add external perf_callchain_entry parameter for get_perf_callchain to
>>> allow us to use external buffer from BPF side. The biggest advantage is
>>> that it can reduce unnecessary copies.
>>>
>>> Todo
>>> ====
>>> If the above changes are reasonable, it seems that
>>> get_callchain_entry_for_task
>>> could also use an external perf_callchain_entry.
>>>
>>> But I'm not sure if this modification is appropriate. After all, the
>>> implementation of get_callchain_entry in the perf subsystem seems
>>> much more
>>> complex than directly using an external buffer.
>>>
>>> Comments and suggestions are always welcome.
>>>
>>> Tao Chen (2):
>>> perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain
>>> bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain
>> hi,
>> I can't get this applied on bpf-next/master, what do I miss?
>
> This path is not based on top of latest bpf/bpf-next tree.
> The current diff:
>
> struct perf_callchain_entry *
> -get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool
> user,
> - u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
> +get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry
> *external_entry,
> + u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool user, u32 max_stack, bool
> crosstask,
> + bool add_mark)
> {
>
> The actual signature in kernel/events/callchain.c
>
> struct perf_callchain_entry *
> get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
> u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
> {
>
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> jirka
>>
>>
>>> include/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++--
>>> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>> kernel/events/callchain.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>> kernel/events/core.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.48.1
>>>
>
My mistake. I’ll update the code and resend it.
--
Best Regards
Tao Chen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 17:47 [PATCH bpf-next RFC 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-13 17:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next RFC 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-13 17:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next RFC 2/2] bpf: Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-13 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next RFC 0/2] " Jiri Olsa
2025-10-13 21:37 ` Yonghong Song
2025-10-14 5:36 ` Tao Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb3b054b-3c21-4941-800c-4519cae9ce31@linux.dev \
--to=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).