From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
<coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf arm: Workaround ARM PMUs cpu maps having offline cpus
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:16:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc4ac58b-6a0b-1d72-f881-a60b43d5c229@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607065343.695369-1-irogers@google.com>
Hi Ian,
On 2024/6/7 14:53, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When PMUs have a cpu map in the 'cpus' or 'cpumask' file, perf will
> try to open events on those CPUs. ARM doesn't remove offline CPUs
> meaning taking a CPU offline will cause perf commands to fail unless a
> CPU map is passed on the command line.
>
> More context in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603092812.46616-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/
>
> Reported-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603092812.46616-2-yangyicong@huawei.com/
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested worked for this case:
[root@localhost tmp]# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
[root@localhost tmp]# /home/yang/perf_static stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ --timeout 100
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 19 (No such device) for event (armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
[root@localhost tmp]# /tmp/perf_Ian stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/ --timeout 100
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
54994604 armv8_pmuv3_0/cpu_cycles/
0.176079800 seconds time elapsed
So:
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
But still wondering why isn't it better to move this into pmu_cpumask() as does in
the previous patch? Yes currently this is a arm specific issue, but we cannot handle
the case if later PMU doesn't update the cpus/cpumask either :)
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> index 8b7cb68ba1a8..6b544edbd3f6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c
> @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@
>
> #include "arm-spe.h"
> #include "hisi-ptt.h"
> +#include "../../../util/cpumap.h"
> #include "../../../util/pmu.h"
> #include "../../../util/cs-etm.h"
> #include "../../arm64/util/mem-events.h"
>
> -void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused)
> +void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> {
> + struct perf_cpu_map *intersect;
> +
> #ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> if (!strcmp(pmu->name, CORESIGHT_ETM_PMU_NAME)) {
> /* add ETM default config here */
> @@ -33,6 +36,9 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused)
> pmu->selectable = true;
> #endif
> }
> -
> #endif
> + /* Workaround some ARM PMU's failing to correctly set CPU maps for online processors. */
> + intersect = perf_cpu_map__intersect(cpu_map__online(), pmu->cpus);
> + perf_cpu_map__put(pmu->cpus);
> + pmu->cpus = intersect;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 6:53 [PATCH v1] perf arm: Workaround ARM PMUs cpu maps having offline cpus Ian Rogers
2024-06-10 13:29 ` Leo Yan
2024-06-10 17:33 ` Ian Rogers
2024-06-12 20:32 ` Leo Yan
2024-06-12 20:59 ` Ian Rogers
2024-06-12 10:16 ` Yicong Yang [this message]
2024-06-12 11:52 ` Ian Rogers
2024-06-24 17:50 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc4ac58b-6a0b-1d72-f881-a60b43d5c229@huawei.com \
--to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).