From: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Tuan Phan <tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Bhaskara Budiredla <bbudiredla@marvell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:19:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce31a50b-53db-4c6f-9cb1-242280b0951c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515060114.3268149-2-irogers@google.com>
On 15/05/2024 07:01, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The mrvl_ddr_pmu is uncore and has a hexadecimal address suffix while
> the previous PMU sorting/merging code assumes uncore PMU names start
> with uncore_ and have a decimal suffix. Because of the previous
> assumption it isn't possible to wildcard the mrvl_ddr_pmu.
>
> Modify pmu_name_len_no_suffix but also remove the suffix number out
> argument, this is because we don't know if a suffix number of say 100
> is in hexadecimal or decimal. As the only use of the suffix number is
> in comparisons, it is safe there to compare the values as hexadecimal.
> Modify perf_pmu__match_ignoring_suffix so that hexadecimal suffixes
> are ignored.
>
> Only allow hexadecimal suffixes to be greater than length 2 (ie 3 or
> more) so that S390's cpum_cf PMU doesn't lose its suffix.
>
> Change the return type of pmu_name_len_no_suffix to size_t to
> workaround GCC incorrectly determining the result could be negative.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------
> tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> tools/perf/util/pmus.h | 7 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
Hi Ian,
Perf test "perf_all_PMU_test" is failing when run against
next-master(next-20240612) kernel with Arm64 on JUNO in our CI. It looks
like it is failing when run on JUNO alone. Verified by running on other
boards like RB5 and Ampere_altra and confirming that it does not fail on
these boards. Suspecting that the suffixed 'armv8_pmuv3_0' naming could
be the reason of test failure.
Reverting the change (3241d46f5f54) seems to fix it.
This works fine on Linux version v6.10-rc3
Failure log
------------
110: perf all PMU test:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 8279
Testing armv8_pmuv3/br_immed_retired/
Event 'armv8_pmuv3/br_immed_retired/' not printed in:
# Running 'internals/synthesize' benchmark:
Computing performance of single threaded perf event synthesis by
synthesizing events on the perf process itself:
Average synthesis took: 1169.431 usec (+- 0.144 usec)
Average num. events: 35.000 (+- 0.000)
Average time per event 33.412 usec
Average data synthesis took: 1225.698 usec (+- 0.102 usec)
Average num. events: 119.000 (+- 0.000)
Average time per event 10.300 usec
Performance counter stats for 'perf bench internals synthesize':
3263664785 armv8_pmuv3_0/br_immed_retired/
25.472854464 seconds time elapsed
8.004791000 seconds user
17.060209000 seconds sys
---- end(-1) ----
110: perf all PMU test :
FAILED!
Thanks,
Aishwarya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-15 6:01 [PATCH v6 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu Ian Rogers
2024-05-15 6:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Ian Rogers
2024-06-12 11:19 ` Aishwarya TCV [this message]
2024-06-12 12:28 ` James Clark
2024-06-12 12:32 ` Ian Rogers
2024-06-12 13:12 ` James Clark
2024-06-12 13:56 ` Robin Murphy
2024-06-12 14:56 ` Ian Rogers
2024-05-15 6:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] perf tests: Add some pmu core functionality tests Ian Rogers
2024-05-23 3:54 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu Namhyung Kim
2024-05-29 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce31a50b-53db-4c6f-9cb1-242280b0951c@arm.com \
--to=aishwarya.tcv@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=bbudiredla@marvell.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).