From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v7 00/12] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:35:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cef60d5a-a975-4b4e-b553-9aaaaf6da558@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828013435.1528459-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 8/28/2025 9:34 AM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> Changes:
> v6 -> v7:
> * Rebase code to last tip perf/core tree.
> * Opportunistically remove the redundant is_x86_event() prototype.
> (Patch 01/12)
> * Fix PEBS handler NULL event access and record loss issue.
> (Patch 02/12)
> * Reset MSR_IA32_PEBS_INDEX at the head of_drain_arch_pebs() instead
> of end. It avoids the processed PEBS records are processed again in
> some corner cases like event throttling. (Patch 08/12)
Hi Peter,
Do you have more comments on this arch-PEBS enabling patch-set? Thanks.
(The warning raised by kernel test robot about patch 02/12 would be fixed
in next version.)
>
> v5 -> v6:
> * Rebase code to last tip perf/core tree + "x86 perf bug fixes and
> optimization" patchset
>
> v4 -> v5:
> * Rebase code to 6.16-rc3
> * Allocate/free arch-PEBS buffer in callbacks *prepare_cpu/*dead_cpu
> (patch 07/10, Peter)
> * Code and comments refine (patch 09/10, Peter)
>
>
> This patchset introduces architectural PEBS support for Intel platforms
> like Clearwater Forest (CWF) and Panther Lake (PTL). The detailed
> information about arch-PEBS can be found in chapter 11
> "architectural PEBS" of "Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions
> and Future Features".
>
> This patch set doesn't include the SSP and SIMD regs (OPMASK/YMM/ZMM)
> sampling support for arch-PEBS to avoid the dependency for the basic
> SIMD regs sampling support patch series[1]. Once the basic SIMD regs
> sampling is supported, the arch-PEBS based SSP and SIMD regs
> (OPMASK/YMM/ZMM) sampling would be supported in a later patch set.
>
> Tests:
> Run below tests on Clearwater Forest and Pantherlake, no issue is
> found.
>
> 1. Basic perf counting case.
> perf stat -e '{branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,cycles,instructions,ref-cycles}' sleep 1
>
> 2. Basic PMI based perf sampling case.
> perf record -e '{branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,cycles,instructions,ref-cycles}' sleep 1
>
> 3. Basic PEBS based perf sampling case.
> perf record -e '{branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,branches,cycles,instructions,ref-cycles}:p' sleep 1
>
> 4. PEBS sampling case with basic, GPRs, vector-registers and LBR groups
> perf record -e branches:p -Iax,bx,ip,xmm0 -b -c 10000 sleep 1
>
> 5. User space PEBS sampling case with basic, GPRs and LBR groups
> perf record -e branches:p --user-regs=ax,bx,ip -b -c 10000 sleep 1
>
> 6. PEBS sampling case with auxiliary (memory info) group
> perf mem record sleep 1
>
> 7. PEBS sampling case with counter group
> perf record -e '{branches:p,branches,cycles}:S' -c 10000 sleep 1
>
> 8. Perf stat and record test
> perf test 100; perf test 131
>
>
> History:
> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821035805.159494-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250623223546.112465-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250620103909.1586595-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250415114428.341182-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250218152818.158614-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250123140721.2496639-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/
>
> Ref:
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815213435.1702022-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
>
> Dapeng Mi (12):
> perf/x86: Remove redundant is_x86_event() prototype
> perf/x86/intel: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss
> perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call
> perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check
> perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS
> perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions
> perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group processing code to functions
> perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments
> perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR
> perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level
> perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups
> perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS
>
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 21 +-
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 268 ++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 621 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 41 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel_ds.h | 10 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 20 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 116 +++++-
> 7 files changed, 955 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: f49e1be19542487921e82b29004908966cb99d7c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-09 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 1:34 [Patch v7 00/12] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 01/12] perf/x86: Remove redundant is_x86_event() prototype Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 02/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix NULL event access and potential PEBS record loss Dapeng Mi
2025-09-08 8:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-08 9:05 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-28 6:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-30 5:19 ` Oliver Sang
2025-09-30 6:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-02 7:09 ` Oliver Sang
2025-10-06 8:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 05/12] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 06/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 07/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group " Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 09/12] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 10/12] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 11/12] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-08-28 1:34 ` [Patch v7 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-09-19 5:55 ` [Patch v7 00/12] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Mi, Dapeng
2025-10-09 8:35 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cef60d5a-a975-4b4e-b553-9aaaaf6da558@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).