linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com" <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"irogers@google.com" <irogers@google.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ravi.bangoria@amd.com" <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	"ananth.narayan@amd.com" <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gautham.shenoy@amd.com" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu() function
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:28:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da8e731480d0f4b8284c6fc69e68f2aab2b23292.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025111348.3810-4-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>

On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 11:13 +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
> Post which, one CPU might be mapped to more than one rapl_pmu
> (package/die one and a core one). So, remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu()
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

thanks,
rui

> ---
>  arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 19 ++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index f70c49ca0ef3..d20c5b1dd0ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -162,17 +162,6 @@ static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int
> cpu)
>                                         
> topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
> -{
> -       unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
> -
> -       /*
> -        * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for
> non
> -        * existent mappings in the topology map.
> -        */
> -       return rapl_pmu_idx < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu ? rapl_pmus-
> >pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] : NULL;
> -}
> -
>  static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>         u64 raw;
> @@ -348,7 +337,7 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_del(struct perf_event
> *event, int flags)
>  static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>         u64 cfg = event->attr.config & RAPL_EVENT_MASK;
> -       int bit, ret = 0;
> +       int bit, rapl_pmu_idx, ret = 0;
>         struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
>  
>         /* only look at RAPL events */
> @@ -376,8 +365,12 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event
> *event)
>         if (event->attr.sample_period) /* no sampling */
>                 return -EINVAL;
>  
> +       rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(event->cpu);
> +       if (rapl_pmu_idx >= rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
>         /* must be done before validate_group */
> -       pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
> +       pmu = rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx];
>         if (!pmu)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         event->pmu_private = pmu;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25 11:13 [PATCH v6 00/10] Add RAPL core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28  6:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28  6:38     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01  7:20       ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28  8:27   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28  8:53   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28  9:19     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01  8:06       ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04  3:15         ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-04  7:15           ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04  8:04             ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01  7:28   ` Zhang, Rui [this message]
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28  9:01   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01  7:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01  7:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-08 10:12   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add arguments to the init and cleanup functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 12:31   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01  7:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:27   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01  7:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:35   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01  7:30   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] perf/x86/rapl: Move the cntr_mask to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:54   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01  7:37   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-08  9:52   ` Gautham R. Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da8e731480d0f4b8284c6fc69e68f2aab2b23292.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).