From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf stat: Make default perf stat command work on Arm big.LITTLE
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:10:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dac6ad1d-5aca-48b4-9dcb-ff7e54ca43f6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ac3fc9d-4ed6-46ed-b537-13d27ba46e3b@linaro.org>
On 13/08/2024 3:45 pm, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 13/08/2024 3:35 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:24 AM James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The important patches are 3 and 5, the rest are tidyups and tests.
>>>
>>> I don't think there is any interaction with the other open issues
>>> about the uncore DSU cycles event or JSON/legacy hw event priorities
>>> because only hw events on core PMUs are used for the default
>>> stat command. And also just sharing the existing x86 code works so
>>> no big changes are required.
>>>
>>> For patch 3 the weak arch specific symbol has to continue to be used
>>> rather than picking the implementation based on
>>> perf_pmus__supports_extended_type() like in patch 5. This is because
>>> that function ends up calling evsel__hw_name() itself which results
>>> in recursion. But at least one weak arch_* construct has been removed,
>>> so it's better than nothing.
>>
>> Let's not do things this way. The use of strings is architecture
>> neutral, means we don't need to create new arch functions on things
>> like RISC-V, it encapsulates the complexity of things like topdown
>
> If the new arch function is an issue that could be worked around by
> calling perf_pmus__supports_extended_type() on patch 3 as well? It just
> needs a small change to not recurse.
>
>> events, Apple ARM M CPUs not supporting legacy events, etc.
>
> If Apple M doesn't support the HW events does _any_ default Perf stat
> command (hybrid or not) work? I'm not really trying to fix that here,
> just make whatever already works work on big.LITTLE.
>
>> Duplicating the existing x86 logic, when that was something trying to
>> be removed, is not the way to go. That logic was a holdover from the
>> hybrid tech debt we've been working to remove with a generic approach.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>
> I think all of that may make sense, but in this case I haven't actually
> duplicated anything, rather shared the existing code to also be used on
> Arm.
>
> This means we can have the default perf stat working on Arm from today,
> and if any other changes get made it will continue to work as I've also
> added a test for it.
>
I would also like to note that (not including the new test) this
patchset _removes_ more code than it adds, so to say it duplicates code
is a bit unfair.
Of course this touches some similar areas to your other change, but that
doesn't mean I think we shouldn't continue with that one. I'm still
happy to review and test or contribute to that one if you like. I think
it just helped me to do it in this order and get this thing in a working
state first before the next bigger step.
>>> James Clark (7):
>>> perf stat: Initialize instead of overwriting clock event
>>> perf stat: Remove unused default_null_attrs
>>> perf evsel: Use the same arch_evsel__hw_name() on arm64 as x86
>>> perf evsel: Remove duplicated __evsel__hw_name() code
>>> perf evlist: Use hybrid default attrs whenever extended type is
>>> supported
>>> perf test: Make stat test work on DT devices
>>> perf test: Add a test for default perf stat command
>>>
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build | 1 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/evsel.c | 7 ++++
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c | 65 ------------------------------
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c | 17 +-------
>>> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 12 ++----
>>> tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh | 33 ++++++++++++---
>>> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 6 +--
>>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 19 +++++++++
>>> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 +-
>>> 10 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/evsel.c
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 13:23 [PATCH 0/7] perf stat: Make default perf stat command work on Arm big.LITTLE James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf stat: Initialize instead of overwriting clock event James Clark
2024-08-13 14:28 ` Ian Rogers
2024-08-13 14:38 ` James Clark
2024-08-13 14:43 ` Ian Rogers
2024-08-13 14:56 ` James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf stat: Remove unused default_null_attrs James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf evsel: Use the same arch_evsel__hw_name() on arm64 as x86 James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf evsel: Remove duplicated __evsel__hw_name() code James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf evlist: Use hybrid default attrs whenever extended type is supported James Clark
2024-08-13 13:33 ` James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf test: Make stat test work on DT devices James Clark
2024-08-13 13:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf test: Add a test for default perf stat command James Clark
2024-08-13 14:35 ` [PATCH 0/7] perf stat: Make default perf stat command work on Arm big.LITTLE Ian Rogers
2024-08-13 14:45 ` James Clark
2024-08-13 15:10 ` James Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dac6ad1d-5aca-48b4-9dcb-ff7e54ca43f6@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zegao2021@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).