From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix fails of perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup on s390
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:07:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de0dd86a-4c49-49ed-a90b-4890c82a7b2d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgJUgVGpQJ=KgH+3RzAJ8Ce50Acr=gSZh_ZLuiTa3-sEg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/8/23 00:26, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. But I think it should support
> machines without systemd (or maybe with old versions).
>
> Also probably you want to reset the behavior after
> the test. I think we can just run some built-in test
> workload like `perf test -w thloop`.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
Thanks for our feedback.
Well regarding the use of systemd daemon-reexec the manual says
this command restarts the systemd triggered processes.
There is nothing to reset. All ports stay active while the command
is processed.
I tried your 'perf test -w thloop`, but that did not trigger
anything on system.slice.
I do not understand enough about cgroups and system.slice, but I am
under the impression, that the system.slice just increment counters
when executed by processes under systemd control. Maybe I am wrong.
The only other workload which always incremented system.slice counters
was 'ssh localhost ls -l', which involves local login and a running sshd.
Thanks for your advice on how to continue on this.
--
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 12:57 [PATCH] perf test: Fix fails of perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup on s390 Thomas Richter
2023-12-07 23:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-12-08 11:07 ` Thomas Richter [this message]
2023-12-08 11:29 ` Thomas Richter
2023-12-11 23:13 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de0dd86a-4c49-49ed-a90b-4890c82a7b2d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).