From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:14:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df6ef8c1-a283-4ef7-9c49-1265a1b96788@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f611dcd599d6d65325d8c40566a1fc35b447ea2.1792064123.git.sandipan.das@amd.com>
LGTM. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 10/15/2026 7:46 PM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> The branch snapshot callback used by bpf_get_branch_snapshot() always
> copies x86_pmu.lbr_nr entries from cpuc->lbr_entries[], even when the
> last LBR read kept fewer branches. The entries past lbr_stack.nr hold
> invalid branches which end up reaching BPF programs.
>
> Limit copying to lbr_stack.nr entries and also reset lbr_stack.nr when
> intel_pmu_lbr_read() skips reading the registers so that a stale count
> is never reused.
>
> Fixes: c22ac2a3d4bd ("perf: Enable branch record for software events")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-163130@kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 0a34d674df59..5dfb9e9156e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ __intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries,
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> intel_pmu_lbr_read();
> - cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
> + cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, cpuc->lbr_stack.nr);
>
> memcpy(entries, cpuc->lbr_entries, sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) * cnt);
> intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> index 0b446d8912e4..6b070490f461 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> @@ -1026,8 +1026,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
> * but this simple approach seems to work for now.
> */
> if (!cpuc->lbr_users || vlbr_exclude_host() ||
> - cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users)
> + cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users) {
> + cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = 0;
> return;
> + }
>
> x86_pmu.lbr_read(cpuc);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 11:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf/x86: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: " Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-15 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:14 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-10-16 0:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-16 3:11 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-16 7:19 ` Sandipan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df6ef8c1-a283-4ef7-9c49-1265a1b96788@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox