From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, dapeng1.mi@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
thomas.falcon@intel.com, xudong.hao@intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf/x86: Reduce is_hybrid calls and aid ellision of BUG_ON in hybrid_pmu
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:44:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e26d0945-6406-4fe2-bd0d-154aacb1d245@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312054810.1571020-2-irogers@google.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 3/12/2026 1:48 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Use the capabilities of the PMU rather than the global variable
> perf_is_hybrid to determine if a hybrid pmu has been passed to the
> main accessors. As the pmu capabilities check mirrors that in
> is_x86_pmu, the BUG_ON(!is_x86_pmu...) in hybrid_pmu can be elided as
> it is provably always false (with sufficient function inlining, common
> sub-expression elimination, etc.) in its most common uses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> Only build tested.
> ---
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index f1123c95d174..7990d86ef233 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -802,34 +802,38 @@ static __always_inline struct x86_hybrid_pmu *hybrid_pmu(struct pmu *pmu)
> extern struct static_key_false perf_is_hybrid;
> #define is_hybrid() static_branch_unlikely(&perf_is_hybrid)
>
> -#define hybrid(_pmu, _field) \
> -(*({ \
> - typeof(&x86_pmu._field) __Fp = &x86_pmu._field; \
> - \
> - if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
> - __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
> - \
> - __Fp; \
> +
> +#define hybrid(_pmu, _field) \
> +(*({ \
> + typeof(&x86_pmu._field) __Fp = &x86_pmu._field; \
> + struct pmu *__pmu = _pmu; \
> + \
> + if (__pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE) \
> + __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(__pmu)->_field; \
> + \
> + __Fp; \
> }))
>
> -#define hybrid_var(_pmu, _var) \
> -(*({ \
> - typeof(&_var) __Fp = &_var; \
> - \
> - if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
> - __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_var; \
> - \
> - __Fp; \
> +#define hybrid_var(_pmu, _var) \
> +(*({ \
> + typeof(&_var) __Fp = &_var; \
> + struct pmu *__pmu = _pmu; \
> + \
> + if (__pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE) \
> + __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(__pmu)->_var; \
> + \
> + __Fp; \
> }))
>
> -#define hybrid_bit(_pmu, _field) \
> -({ \
> - bool __Fp = x86_pmu._field; \
> - \
> - if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
> - __Fp = hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
> - \
> - __Fp; \
> +#define hybrid_bit(_pmu, _field) \
> +({ \
> + bool __Fp = x86_pmu._field; \
> + struct pmu *__pmu = _pmu; \
> + \
> + if (__pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE) \
> + __Fp = hybrid_pmu(__pmu)->_field; \
> + \
> + __Fp; \
> })
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 7:52 [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Fix OMR snoop information parsing issues Dapeng Mi
2026-03-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-03-12 4:44 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-12 5:04 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/x86: Avoid inadvertent casts to x86_hybrid_pmu Ian Rogers
2026-03-12 5:48 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] perf/x86: Reduce is_hybrid calls and aid ellision of BUG_ON in hybrid_pmu Ian Rogers
2026-03-12 6:44 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-03-12 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 15:06 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-12 6:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] perf/x86: Avoid inadvertent casts to x86_hybrid_pmu Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 8:25 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-12 9:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 15:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-13 0:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 6:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 6:17 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-12 4:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Fix OMR snoop information parsing issues Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e26d0945-6406-4fe2-bd0d-154aacb1d245@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox