From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9126f11-177c-cc2f-7620-fdd7b3f363c0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321181447.1323742-1-sesse@google.com>
On 21/03/2022 20:14, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> There is no good reason why we cannot synthesize "cycle" events
> from Intel PT just as we can synthesize "instruction" events,
> in particular when CYC packets are available. This enables using
> PT to getting much more accurate cycle profiles than regular sampling
> (record -e cycles) when the work last for very short periods (<10 ms).
> Thus, add support for this, based off of the existing IPC calculation
> framework. The new option to --itrace is "y" (for cYcles), as c was
> taken for calls. Cycle and instruction events can be synthesized
> together, and are by default.
>
> The only real caveat is that CYC packets are only emitted whenever
> some other packet is, which in practice is when a branch instruction
> is encountered (and not even all branches). Thus, even at no subsampling
> (e.g. --itrace=y0ns), it is impossible to get more accuracy than
> a single basic block, and all cycles spent executing that block
> will get attributed to the branch instruction that ends the packet.
> Thus, one cannot know whether the cycles came from e.g. a specific load,
> a mispredicted branch, or something else. When subsampling (which
> is the default), the cycle events will get smeared out even more,
> but will still be generally useful to attribute cycle counts to functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/itrace.txt | 3 +-
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-intel-pt.txt | 36 ++++++++----
> tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c | 9 ++-
> tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h | 7 ++-
> tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Thanks for sending the patch. There is one variable leftover from my
earlier suggestions - see below.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> index e8613cbda331..364fdfe59828 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> @@ -89,6 +90,10 @@ struct intel_pt {
> u64 instructions_sample_type;
> u64 instructions_id;
>
> + bool sample_cycles;
> + u64 cycles_sample_type;
> + u64 cycles_id;
> +
> bool sample_branches;
> u32 branches_filter;
> u64 branches_sample_type;
> @@ -191,10 +196,13 @@ struct intel_pt_queue {
> u32 flags;
> u16 insn_len;
> u64 last_insn_cnt;
> + u64 last_cyc_cnt;
last_cyc_cnt is an unused
> u64 ipc_insn_cnt;
> u64 ipc_cyc_cnt;
> u64 last_in_insn_cnt;
> u64 last_in_cyc_cnt;
> + u64 last_cy_insn_cnt;
> + u64 last_cy_cyc_cnt;
> u64 last_br_insn_cnt;
> u64 last_br_cyc_cnt;
> unsigned int cbr_seen;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 18:14 [PATCH v2] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-22 7:13 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2022-03-22 8:23 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9126f11-177c-cc2f-7620-fdd7b3f363c0@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sesse@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).