linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, ctshao@google.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 06/15] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:15:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec0827aa-0bae-4625-ad60-f1a1765a4811@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514151401.2547932-7-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On 5/14/25 17:13, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The throttle support has been added in the generic code. Remove
> the driver-specific throttle support.
> 
> Besides the throttle, perf_event_overflow may return true because of
> event_limit. It already does an inatomic event disable. The pmu->stop
> is not required either.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 --
>  arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 5 +----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> index e657fad7e376..6a262e198e35 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> @@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ static int cfdiag_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
>  	}
>  
>  	overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, &regs);
> -	if (overflow)
> -		event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
>  
>  	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>  	return overflow;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> index ad22799d8a7d..91469401f2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> @@ -1072,10 +1072,7 @@ static int perf_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
>  	overflow = 0;
>  	if (perf_event_exclude(event, &regs, sde_regs))
>  		goto out;
> -	if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, &regs)) {
> -		overflow = 1;
> -		event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> -	}
> +	overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, &regs);
>  	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>  out:
>  	return overflow;

I have installed patch 1 and 6 on top of the linux-next kernel today.
The results look good, much better than before, but I still do not
get both counter values in sync on each iteration all the time.

Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt

Geschäftsführung: David Faller

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 15:13 [PATCH V2 00/15] perf: Fix the throttle logic for group kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 01/15] perf: Fix the throttle logic for a group kan.liang
2025-05-15  9:43   ` Leo Yan
2025-05-15 12:55     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-16 12:51       ` Leo Yan
2025-05-16 13:28         ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-16 14:17           ` Leo Yan
2025-05-16 14:33             ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 02/15] perf/x86/intel: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 03/15] perf/x86/amd: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 04/15] perf/x86/zhaoxin: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 05/15] powerpc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 06/15] s390/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-15 13:15   ` Thomas Richter [this message]
2025-05-15 13:56     ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 07/15] perf/arm: " kan.liang
2025-05-16 13:24   ` Leo Yan
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 08/15] perf/apple_m1: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 09/15] alpha/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 10/15] arc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 11/15] csky/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-15  6:34   ` Guo Ren
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 12/15] loongarch/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 13/15] sparc/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:14 ` [PATCH V2 14/15] xtensa/perf: " kan.liang
2025-05-14 15:14 ` [PATCH V2 15/15] mips/perf: " kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec0827aa-0bae-4625-ad60-f1a1765a4811@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ctshao@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).