public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	"Falcon, Thomas" <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>
Cc: "atrajeev@linux.ibm.com" <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"venkat88@linux.ibm.com" <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com" <Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com>,
	"tmricht@linux.ibm.com" <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	"hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"mpetlan@redhat.com" <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
	"Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com" <Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maddy@linux.ibm.com" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	"vmolnaro@redhat.com" <vmolnaro@redhat.com>,
	"Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com" <Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Mi, Dapeng1" <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/test: Check for perf stat return code in perf all PMU test
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 08:48:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec1e04d3-4235-4593-80bb-270a86e6b01f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWR6v7kKSMVD+ANwMTmOdc4zKLEVY+9tNR5n+kq0F=Mkg@mail.gmail.com>


On 4/3/2026 11:39 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 12:36 AM Mi, Dapeng <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/3/2026 1:32 AM, Falcon, Thomas wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2026-04-01 at 13:40 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 3:40 AM Venkat <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15 Mar 2026, at 4:27 PM, Athira Rajeev
>>>>>> <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently in "perf all PMU test", for "perf stat -e <event>
>>>>>> true",
>>>>>> below checks are done:
>>>>>> - if return code is zero, look for "not supported" to decide pass
>>>>>>  scenario
>>>>>> - check for "not supported" to ignore the event
>>>>>> - looks for "No permission to enable" to skip the event.
>>>>>> - If output has "Bad event name", fail the test.
>>>>>> - Use "Access to performance monitoring and observability
>>>>>> operations is
>>>>>>  limited." to ignore fail due to access limitations
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we failed to see event and it is supported, retries with
>>>>>> longer
>>>>>> workload "perf bench internals synthesize".
>>>>>> - Here if output has <event>, the test is a pass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snippet of code check:
>>>>>>  ```
>>>>>>  output=$(perf stat -e "$p" perf bench internals synthesize 2>&1)
>>>>>>  if echo "$output" | grep -q "$p"
>>>>>>  ```
>>>>>> - if output doesn't have event printed in logs, considers it
>>>>>> fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this results in false pass for events in some cases.
>>>>>> Example, if perf stat fails as below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # ./perf stat -e pmu/event/  true
>>>>>> event syntax error: 'pmu/event/'
>>>>>>                     \___ Bad event or PMU
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unable to find PMU or event on a PMU of 'pmu'
>>>>>> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -e, --event <event>   event selector. use 'perf list' to list
>>>>>> available events
>>>>>> # echo $?
>>>>>> 129
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since this has non-zero return code and doesn't have the
>>>>>> fail strings being checked in the test, it will enter check using
>>>>>> longer workload. and since the output fail log has event, it
>>>>>> declares test as "supported".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since all the fail strings can't be added in the check, update
>>>>>> the testcase to check return code before proceeding to longer
>>>>>> workload run.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another missing scenario is when system wide monitoring is
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>> example:
>>>>>> # ./perf stat -e pmu/event/ true
>>>>>> Error:
>>>>>> No supported events found.
>>>>>>  Unsupported event (pmu/event/H) in per-thread mode, enable
>>>>>> system wide with '-a'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Update testcase to check with "perf stat -a -e $p" as well
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>> Tested this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With this patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_INST/ -- perf stat failed with non-zero
>>>>> return code
>>>>> Testing hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_PCYC/ -- perf stat failed with non-zero
>>>>> return code
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Testing on an Intel Alderlake the test is now failing:
>>>> ```
>>>> ...
>>>> Testing offcore_requests_outstanding.l3_miss_demand_data_rd --
>>>> supported
>>>> Testing ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response -- perf stat failed with
>>>> non-zero return code
>>>> Testing ocr.partial_streaming_wr.any_response -- perf stat failed
>>>> with
>>>> non-zero return code
>>>> Testing ocr.streaming_wr.any_response -- supported
>>>> ...
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> Running `perf stat` manually reveals an issue with the event:
>>>> ```
>>>> $ sudo perf stat -vv -e ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response -a sleep
>>>> 1
>>>> Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-B7-1
>>>> Attempt to add: cpu_atom/ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response/
>>>> ..after resolving event:
>>>> cpu_atom/event=0xb7,period=0x186a3,umask=0x1,offcore_rsp=0x8000000100
>>>> 00/
>>>> ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response ->
>>>> cpu_atom/ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response/
>>>> Control descriptor is not initialized
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> perf_event_attr:
>>>>  type                             10 (cpu_atom)
>>>>  size                             144
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> perf_event_attr:
>>>>  type                             0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
>>>>  config                           0xa00000000
>>>> (cpu_atom/PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES/)
>>>>  disabled                         1
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0  cpu -1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 3
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> perf_event_attr:
>>>>  type                             0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
>>>>  config                           0x400000000
>>>> (cpu_core/PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES/)
>>>>  disabled                         1
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0  cpu -1  group_fd -1  flags 0x8 = 3
>>>>  config                           0x1b7
>>>> (ocr.demand_data_rd.l3_hit.snoop_hit_no_fwd)
>>>>  sample_type                      IDENTIFIER
>>>>  read_format
>>>> TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING
>>>>  disabled                         1
>>>>  inherit                          1
>>>>  { bp_addr, config1 }             0x800000010000
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> sys_perf_event_open: pid -1  cpu 16  group_fd -1  flags 0x8
>>>> sys_perf_event_open failed, error -22
>>>> switching off deferred callchain support
>>>> Warning:
>>>> ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response event is not supported by the
>>>> kernel.
>>>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall failed for event
>>>> (ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response): Invalid argument
>>>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>>>
>>>> Error:
>>>> No supported events found.
>>>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall failed for event
>>>> (ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response): Invalid argument
>>>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>>> ```
>>>>
>>>> This looks like a latent Intel cpu_atom PMU bug. Thomas, wdyt?
>> Hmm, it looks the error is caused by the invalid bitmask of OFFCORE_RSP_x
>> MSRs. Currently the valid bitmask of OFFCORE_RSP_x MSR is set to
>> 0x3fffffffff in intel_grt_extra_regs[], while the msr value is set
>> 0x800000010000 for the ocr.full_streaming_wr.any_response event. The bit 47
>> is recognized an invalid bit and then abort the event creation.
>>
>> Base on the description "Table 21-56. MSR_OFFCORE_RSPx Request Type
>> Definition" in SDM, bit 47 should be a valid bit now. Suppose bit 47 should
>> not be a valid bit when adding the ADL PMU support, but it's updated and
>> becomes valid later.
>>
>> Along with the constant updates of perf event lists
>> (https://github.com/intel/perfmon), we have noticed there are mismatches
>> more or less between the driver hardcoded events and perfmon event list.
>> Currently we are summarizing the mismatches. Once these mismatches are
>> finalized. we would submit a patchset to fix these mismatches.
> That's great, if it takes too long perhaps we could just remove the
> events for now.

Suppose it won't be too long. I plan to post the patchset in next release
cycle. The code changes are simple but need much time to verify on all
kinds of platforms. Thanks.


>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> +Dapeng, Zide, Andi
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Venkat.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
>>>>>> b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
>>>>>> index 9c466c0efa85..6c4d59cbfa5f 100755
>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
>>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,26 @@ do
>>>>>>     continue
>>>>>>   fi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +  # check with system wide if it is supported.
>>>>>> +  output=$(perf stat -a -e "$p" true 2>&1)
>>>>>> +  stat_result=$?
>>>>>> +  if echo "$output" | grep -q "not supported"
>>>>>> +  then
>>>>>> +    # Event not supported, so ignore.
>>>>>> +    echo "not supported"
>>>>>> +    continue
>>>>>> +  fi
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  # checked through possible access limitations and permissions.
>>>>>> +  # At this step, non-zero return code from "perf stat" needs to
>>>>>> +  # reported as fail for the user to investigate
>>>>>> +  if [ $stat_result -ne 0 ]
>>>>>> +  then
>>>>>> +    echo "perf stat failed with non-zero return code"
>>>>>> +    err=1
>>>>>> +    continue
>>>>>> +  fi
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>   # We failed to see the event and it is supported. Possibly the
>>>>>> workload was
>>>>>>   # too small so retry with something longer.
>>>>>>   output=$(perf stat -e "$p" perf bench internals synthesize
>>>>>> 2>&1)
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.47.3
>>>>>>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-07  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-15 10:57 [PATCH] tools/perf/test: Check for perf stat return code in perf all PMU test Athira Rajeev
2026-03-23 10:39 ` Venkat
2026-04-01 20:40   ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-01 23:48     ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-01 23:57       ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-02 15:45         ` Athira Rajeev
2026-04-03  1:27           ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-02 17:32     ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-04-03  7:36       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-03 15:39         ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-07  0:48           ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec1e04d3-4235-4593-80bb-270a86e6b01f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com \
    --cc=Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com \
    --cc=Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox