From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jin, Yao" Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: distinguish between inliners in the same function Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:11:14 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170427215950.6649-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:57525 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbdEBCLR (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 22:11:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170427215950.6649-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Milian Wolff , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra SNIP > ~~~~~ > $ perf report --stdio --inline --no-children > Failed to open [ext4], continuing without symbols > # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only > options. > # > # > # Total Lost Samples: 0 > # > # Samples: 499 of event 'cycles' > # Event count (approx.): 329354953 > # > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol > # ........ ......... ................. ................................ > # > 96.70% ex_random ex_random [.] main > | > ---main > __libc_start_main > _start > ... > ~~~~~ > > Note how no inlined frames are actually shown, because the first > sample in main points to an IP that does not correspond to any > inlined frames. perf report -g address --inline --stdio Did you try with "-g address" option? It's sorted by address. But anyway, I like this patch. It works well in my test. Thanks Jin Yao