* [PATCH] perf test: Basic branch counter support
@ 2023-11-07 17:44 kan.liang
2023-11-07 18:05 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2023-11-07 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, irogers, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users
Cc: peterz, mingo, jolsa, namhyung, adrian.hunter, tinghao.zhang,
Kan Liang
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Add a basic test for the branch counter feature.
The test verifies that
- The new filter can be successfully applied on the supported platforms.
- The counter value can be outputted via the perf report -D
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
index 4fbc74805d52..2783e867c07c 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ err=0
perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
testprog="perf test -w thloop"
testsym="test_loop"
+cpu_pmu_dir="/sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu*"
+br_cntr_file="/caps/branch_counter_nr"
+br_cntr_output="branch stack counters"
cleanup() {
rm -rf "${perfdata}"
@@ -154,10 +157,37 @@ test_workload() {
echo "Basic target workload test [Success]"
}
+test_branch_counter() {
+ echo "Basic branch counter test"
+ # Check if the branch counter feature is supported
+ for dir in $cpu_pmu_dir
+ do
+ if [ ! -e "$dir$br_cntr_file" ]
+ then
+ echo "Not support branch counter feature [Skipped]"
+ return
+ fi
+ done
+ if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -j any,counter ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
+ then
+ echo "Basic branch counter test [Failed record]"
+ err=1
+ return
+ fi
+ if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -D -q | grep -q "$br_cntr_output"
+ then
+ echo "Basic branch record test [Failed missing output]"
+ err=1
+ return
+ fi
+ echo "Basic branch counter test [Success]"
+}
+
test_per_thread
test_register_capture
test_system_wide
test_workload
+test_branch_counter
cleanup
exit $err
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Basic branch counter support
2023-11-07 17:44 [PATCH] perf test: Basic branch counter support kan.liang
@ 2023-11-07 18:05 ` Ian Rogers
2023-11-07 18:36 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2023-11-07 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang
Cc: acme, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz, mingo, jolsa,
namhyung, adrian.hunter, tinghao.zhang
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:44 AM <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> Add a basic test for the branch counter feature.
>
> The test verifies that
> - The new filter can be successfully applied on the supported platforms.
> - The counter value can be outputted via the perf report -D
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Kan!
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> index 4fbc74805d52..2783e867c07c 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ err=0
> perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
> testprog="perf test -w thloop"
> testsym="test_loop"
> +cpu_pmu_dir="/sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu*"
> +br_cntr_file="/caps/branch_counter_nr"
> +br_cntr_output="branch stack counters"
>
> cleanup() {
> rm -rf "${perfdata}"
> @@ -154,10 +157,37 @@ test_workload() {
> echo "Basic target workload test [Success]"
> }
>
> +test_branch_counter() {
> + echo "Basic branch counter test"
> + # Check if the branch counter feature is supported
If $cpu_pmu_dir is empty, e.g. ARM and S390, this should also skip.
> + for dir in $cpu_pmu_dir
> + do
> + if [ ! -e "$dir$br_cntr_file" ]
> + then
> + echo "Not support branch counter feature [Skipped]"
Perhaps here it'd be clearer to output:
echo "branch counter feature not supported on all core PMUs ($dir) [Skipped]"
Thanks,
Ian
> + return
> + fi
> + done
> + if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -j any,counter ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
> + then
> + echo "Basic branch counter test [Failed record]"
> + err=1
> + return
> + fi
> + if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -D -q | grep -q "$br_cntr_output"
> + then
> + echo "Basic branch record test [Failed missing output]"
> + err=1
> + return
> + fi
> + echo "Basic branch counter test [Success]"
> +}
> +
> test_per_thread
> test_register_capture
> test_system_wide
> test_workload
> +test_branch_counter
>
> cleanup
> exit $err
> --
> 2.35.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf test: Basic branch counter support
2023-11-07 18:05 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2023-11-07 18:36 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2023-11-07 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Rogers
Cc: acme, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz, mingo, jolsa,
namhyung, adrian.hunter, tinghao.zhang
On 2023-11-07 1:05 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:44 AM <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add a basic test for the branch counter feature.
>>
>> The test verifies that
>> - The new filter can be successfully applied on the supported platforms.
>> - The counter value can be outputted via the perf report -D
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks Kan!
>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> index 4fbc74805d52..2783e867c07c 100755
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ err=0
>> perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
>> testprog="perf test -w thloop"
>> testsym="test_loop"
>> +cpu_pmu_dir="/sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu*"
>> +br_cntr_file="/caps/branch_counter_nr"
>> +br_cntr_output="branch stack counters"
>>
>> cleanup() {
>> rm -rf "${perfdata}"
>> @@ -154,10 +157,37 @@ test_workload() {
>> echo "Basic target workload test [Success]"
>> }
>>
>> +test_branch_counter() {
>> + echo "Basic branch counter test"
>> + # Check if the branch counter feature is supported
>
> If $cpu_pmu_dir is empty, e.g. ARM and S390, this should also skip.
>
Yes, I've tested with a fake unsupported dir. The test case is skipped
as well.
>> + for dir in $cpu_pmu_dir
>> + do
>> + if [ ! -e "$dir$br_cntr_file" ]
>> + then
>> + echo "Not support branch counter feature [Skipped]"
>
> Perhaps here it'd be clearer to output:
> echo "branch counter feature not supported on all core PMUs ($dir) [Skipped]"
>
Sure, I will change it in V2.
Thanks,
Kan
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + done
>> + if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -j any,counter ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
>> + then
>> + echo "Basic branch counter test [Failed record]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -D -q | grep -q "$br_cntr_output"
>> + then
>> + echo "Basic branch record test [Failed missing output]"
>> + err=1
>> + return
>> + fi
>> + echo "Basic branch counter test [Success]"
>> +}
>> +
>> test_per_thread
>> test_register_capture
>> test_system_wide
>> test_workload
>> +test_branch_counter
>>
>> cleanup
>> exit $err
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-07 18:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-07 17:44 [PATCH] perf test: Basic branch counter support kan.liang
2023-11-07 18:05 ` Ian Rogers
2023-11-07 18:36 ` Liang, Kan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).