From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
acme@redhat.com, Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:04:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f435e2d2-f864-4a34-bc38-cb06ce140a6f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618112907.15131-1-vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
On 18/06/2024 12:29, Madadi Vineeth Reddy wrote:
> Currently, the -r/--repeat option accepts values from 0 and complains
> for -1. The help section specifies:
> -r, --repeat <n> repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)
>
I was wondering if this was a regression or was always like this but
it's at least been broken long before it becomes difficult to build
Perf for me.
> The -r -1 option raises an error because replay_repeat is defined as
> an unsigned int.
>
> In the current implementation, the workload is repeated n times when
> -r <n> is used, except when n is 0.
>
> When -r is set to 0, the workload is also repeated once. This happens
> because when -r=0, the run_one_test function is not called. (Note that
> mutex unlocking, which is essential for child threads spawned to emulate
> the workload, happens in run_one_test.) However, mutex unlocking is
> still performed in the destroy_tasks function. Thus, -r=0 results in the
> workload running once coincidentally.
>
I also saw an intermittent hang waiting in destroy_tasks() which is now
fixed.
> To clarify and maintain the existing logic for -r >= 1 (which runs the
> workload the specified number of times) and to fix the issue with infinite
> runs, make -r=0 perform an infinite run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt | 7 +++++++
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> index a216d2991b19..f1be8f0b249e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> @@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ OPTIONS for 'perf sched timehist'
> --state::
> Show task state when it switched out.
>
> +OPTIONS for 'perf sched replay'
> +------------------------------
> +
> +-r::
> +--repeat <n>::
> + repeat the workload n times (0: infinite). Default is 10.
> +
> SEE ALSO
> --------
> linkperf:perf-record[1]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 8cdf18139a7e..2c4ed5c2d695 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -3383,8 +3383,12 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched)
> sched->thread_funcs_exit = false;
> create_tasks(sched);
> printf("------------------------------------------------------------\n");
> - for (i = 0; i < sched->replay_repeat; i++)
> +
> + i = 0;
> + while (sched->replay_repeat == 0 || i < sched->replay_repeat) {
Very minor nit, but you don't really need to remove the for loop, just add
the new condition to the existing one. Not sure if it's worth re-spinning
for though.
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> run_one_test(sched);
> + i++;
> + }
>
> sched->thread_funcs_exit = true;
> destroy_tasks(sched);
> @@ -3548,7 +3552,7 @@ int cmd_sched(int argc, const char **argv)
> };
> const struct option replay_options[] = {
> OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &sched.replay_repeat,
> - "repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)"),
> + "repeat the workload replay N times (0: infinite)"),
> OPT_PARENT(sched_options)
> };
> const struct option map_options[] = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 11:29 [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2024-06-18 13:04 ` James Clark [this message]
2024-06-18 16:09 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f435e2d2-f864-4a34-bc38-cb06ce140a6f@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).