From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com" <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
"gautham.shenoy@amd.com" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"ananth.narayan@amd.com" <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"ravi.bangoria@amd.com" <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"irogers@google.com" <irogers@google.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:20:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f770be5fdb6177367505e85069f2baff0246b9f8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b1aaccc-c31c-492d-bd21-b56d5fba69b2@amd.com>
On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 12:08 +0530, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> > Hello Gautham,
> >
> > On 10/28/2024 11:42 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > > > Hello Dhananjay,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:13:39AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > An earlier commit eliminates the need for this function, so
> > > > > > > > > remove it.
> > > >
> > > > If the commit is merged, please provide the commit id. If it is
> > > > not
> > > > merged, please share the shortlog here with the link to the
> > > > patch > > on
> > > > the mailing list.
> >
> > Sure, The commit I'm referring to here is
> > "[PATCH V2 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug"
> > (
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010142604.770192-2-kan.liang@linux.
> > intel.com/)
> > It is not yet merged, but I've taken it as base for this patch >
> > series.
I see the patch merged in tip tree yesterday.
> >
> > It removes the cpumask handling from rapl.c. Hence, we no longer
> > need > the
> > get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function.
> >
> > I can post a new version or provide newly drafted commit msg here,
> > > whichever way is
> > okay with the maintainers.
> >
> >
Tested this patch set on top of latest tip/perf/core on an Intel
Raptorlake laptop, which has pkg/cores/gpu/psys counters, and didn't
observe any issue. So
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
thanks,
rui
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks and Regards
> > > > gautham.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar
> > > > > > <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 8 +-------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> > > > > > b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> > > > > > index a8defc813c36..f70c49ca0ef3 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> > > > > > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
> > > > > > static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > > - * Helper functions to get the correct topology macros
> > > > > > according > > > to the
> > > > > > + * Helper function to get the correct topology id
> > > > > > according to > > > the
> > > > > > * RAPL PMU scope.
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> > > > > > @@ -162,12 +162,6 @@ static inline unsigned int > > >
> > > > > > get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static inline const struct cpumask
> > > > > > *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int > > > cpu)
> > > > > > -{
> > > > > > - return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? > > >
> > > > > > topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
> > > > > > - > > >
> > > > > > topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
> > > > > > -}
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned
> > > > > > int cpu)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 11:13 [PATCH v6 00/10] Add RAPL core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 6:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28 6:38 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:20 ` Zhang, Rui [this message]
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 8:27 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 8:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28 9:19 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 8:06 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04 3:15 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-04 7:15 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04 8:04 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:28 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 9:01 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-08 10:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add arguments to the init and cleanup functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 12:31 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:27 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:35 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:30 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] perf/x86/rapl: Move the cntr_mask to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:54 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:37 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-08 9:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f770be5fdb6177367505e85069f2baff0246b9f8.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).