From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E0DC43334 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231608AbiFMRLa (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:11:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241837AbiFMRKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:10:16 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A332C54BD1; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 05:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDA0D6E; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 05:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.29.148] (e127744.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.29.148]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 512913F73B; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 05:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver To: Anshuman Khandual , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org Cc: Catalin Marinas , James Clark , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Ingo Molnar , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org References: <20220613100119.684673-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20220613100119.684673-8-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: German Gomez Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:16:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220613100119.684673-8-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Hi Anshuman, thanks for the update, As I mentioned offline, I have a perf test that I've been using for the branch records and filters. I'll let you know the result using this set. On 13/06/2022 11:01, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > [...] > > + > +static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf) > +{ > + int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf); > + > + switch (brbe_el) { > + case BRBINF_EL_EL0: > + return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER; > + case BRBINF_EL_EL1: > + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL; > + case BRBINF_EL_EL2: > + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode()) > + return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL; > + return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV; > + default: > + pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n"); > + return -1; This looks like it should return PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN. Thanks, German > + } > +} > + > +static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event, > + u64 brbinf, int idx) > +{ > > [...] > > + > + if (branch_sample_priv(event)) { > + /* > + * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not > + * available for source only branch records. > + */ > + if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE) > + cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf); > + } > +} > + > > [...]