linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf parse-events x86: Avoid sorting uops_retired.slots
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:40:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <faca2b35-fdd6-7394-edea-32dd59d3a16f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801053634.1142634-2-irogers@google.com>



On 2023-08-01 1:36 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> As topdown.slots may appear as slots it may get confused with
> uops_retired.slots which is an invalid perf metric event group
> leader. Special case uops_retired.slots to avoid this confusion.
> 

Does any name with format "name.slots" cause the confusion? If so, I
don't think we can stop others from naming like the above format.

Is it better to hard code the topdown.slots/slots, rather than
uops_retired.slots?

Thanks,
Kan

> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c | 7 ++++---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c  | 7 +++----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
> index cbd582182932..b1ce0c52d88d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
> @@ -75,11 +75,12 @@ int arch_evlist__add_default_attrs(struct evlist *evlist,
>  
>  int arch_evlist__cmp(const struct evsel *lhs, const struct evsel *rhs)
>  {
> -	if (topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics() && evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(lhs)) {
> +	if (topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics() &&
> +	    (arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs) || arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs))) {
>  		/* Ensure the topdown slots comes first. */
> -		if (strcasestr(lhs->name, "slots"))
> +		if (strcasestr(lhs->name, "slots") && !strcasestr(lhs->name, "uops_retired.slots"))
>  			return -1;
> -		if (strcasestr(rhs->name, "slots"))
> +		if (strcasestr(rhs->name, "slots") && !strcasestr(rhs->name, "uops_retired.slots"))
>  			return 1;
>  		/* Followed by topdown events. */
>  		if (strcasestr(lhs->name, "topdown") && !strcasestr(rhs->name, "topdown"))
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
> index 81d22657922a..090d0f371891 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
> @@ -40,12 +40,11 @@ bool evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)
>  
>  bool arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(const struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
> -	if (!evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(evsel))
> +	if (!evsel__sys_has_perf_metrics(evsel) || !evsel->name ||
> +	    strcasestr(evsel->name, "uops_retired.slots"))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	return evsel->name &&
> -		(strcasestr(evsel->name, "slots") ||
> -		 strcasestr(evsel->name, "topdown"));
> +	return strcasestr(evsel->name, "topdown") || strcasestr(evsel->name, "slots");
>  }
>  
>  int arch_evsel__hw_name(struct evsel *evsel, char *bf, size_t size)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-01 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01  5:36 [PATCH v1 0/4] Intel metric fixes and event updates Ian Rogers
2023-08-01  5:36 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf parse-events x86: Avoid sorting uops_retired.slots Ian Rogers
2023-08-01 15:40   ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2023-08-01 15:54     ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-01 17:48       ` Liang, Kan
2023-08-01  5:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf vendor events intel: Update meteorlake to 1.04 Ian Rogers
2023-08-01  5:36 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf vendor events intel: Update sapphirerapids to 1.15 Ian Rogers
2023-08-01  5:36 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf vendor events intel: Update Icelake+ metric constraints Ian Rogers
2023-08-01 17:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Intel metric fixes and event updates Liang, Kan
2023-08-01 18:51   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=faca2b35-fdd6-7394-edea-32dd59d3a16f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).