* [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity
@ 2024-06-18 11:29 Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2024-06-18 13:04 ` James Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy @ 2024-06-18 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Ian Rogers, Athira Rajeev,
Chen Yu
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, acme, Fernand Sieber,
linux-perf-users, LKML, Madadi Vineeth Reddy
Currently, the -r/--repeat option accepts values from 0 and complains
for -1. The help section specifies:
-r, --repeat <n> repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)
The -r -1 option raises an error because replay_repeat is defined as
an unsigned int.
In the current implementation, the workload is repeated n times when
-r <n> is used, except when n is 0.
When -r is set to 0, the workload is also repeated once. This happens
because when -r=0, the run_one_test function is not called. (Note that
mutex unlocking, which is essential for child threads spawned to emulate
the workload, happens in run_one_test.) However, mutex unlocking is
still performed in the destroy_tasks function. Thus, -r=0 results in the
workload running once coincidentally.
To clarify and maintain the existing logic for -r >= 1 (which runs the
workload the specified number of times) and to fix the issue with infinite
runs, make -r=0 perform an infinite run.
Signed-off-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt | 7 +++++++
tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
index a216d2991b19..f1be8f0b249e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
@@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ OPTIONS for 'perf sched timehist'
--state::
Show task state when it switched out.
+OPTIONS for 'perf sched replay'
+------------------------------
+
+-r::
+--repeat <n>::
+ repeat the workload n times (0: infinite). Default is 10.
+
SEE ALSO
--------
linkperf:perf-record[1]
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
index 8cdf18139a7e..2c4ed5c2d695 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
@@ -3383,8 +3383,12 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched)
sched->thread_funcs_exit = false;
create_tasks(sched);
printf("------------------------------------------------------------\n");
- for (i = 0; i < sched->replay_repeat; i++)
+
+ i = 0;
+ while (sched->replay_repeat == 0 || i < sched->replay_repeat) {
run_one_test(sched);
+ i++;
+ }
sched->thread_funcs_exit = true;
destroy_tasks(sched);
@@ -3548,7 +3552,7 @@ int cmd_sched(int argc, const char **argv)
};
const struct option replay_options[] = {
OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &sched.replay_repeat,
- "repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)"),
+ "repeat the workload replay N times (0: infinite)"),
OPT_PARENT(sched_options)
};
const struct option map_options[] = {
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity
2024-06-18 11:29 [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity Madadi Vineeth Reddy
@ 2024-06-18 13:04 ` James Clark
2024-06-18 16:09 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Clark @ 2024-06-18 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Madadi Vineeth Reddy, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim,
Ian Rogers, Athira Rajeev, Chen Yu
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, acme, Fernand Sieber,
linux-perf-users, LKML
On 18/06/2024 12:29, Madadi Vineeth Reddy wrote:
> Currently, the -r/--repeat option accepts values from 0 and complains
> for -1. The help section specifies:
> -r, --repeat <n> repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)
>
I was wondering if this was a regression or was always like this but
it's at least been broken long before it becomes difficult to build
Perf for me.
> The -r -1 option raises an error because replay_repeat is defined as
> an unsigned int.
>
> In the current implementation, the workload is repeated n times when
> -r <n> is used, except when n is 0.
>
> When -r is set to 0, the workload is also repeated once. This happens
> because when -r=0, the run_one_test function is not called. (Note that
> mutex unlocking, which is essential for child threads spawned to emulate
> the workload, happens in run_one_test.) However, mutex unlocking is
> still performed in the destroy_tasks function. Thus, -r=0 results in the
> workload running once coincidentally.
>
I also saw an intermittent hang waiting in destroy_tasks() which is now
fixed.
> To clarify and maintain the existing logic for -r >= 1 (which runs the
> workload the specified number of times) and to fix the issue with infinite
> runs, make -r=0 perform an infinite run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt | 7 +++++++
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> index a216d2991b19..f1be8f0b249e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
> @@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ OPTIONS for 'perf sched timehist'
> --state::
> Show task state when it switched out.
>
> +OPTIONS for 'perf sched replay'
> +------------------------------
> +
> +-r::
> +--repeat <n>::
> + repeat the workload n times (0: infinite). Default is 10.
> +
> SEE ALSO
> --------
> linkperf:perf-record[1]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 8cdf18139a7e..2c4ed5c2d695 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -3383,8 +3383,12 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched)
> sched->thread_funcs_exit = false;
> create_tasks(sched);
> printf("------------------------------------------------------------\n");
> - for (i = 0; i < sched->replay_repeat; i++)
> +
> + i = 0;
> + while (sched->replay_repeat == 0 || i < sched->replay_repeat) {
Very minor nit, but you don't really need to remove the for loop, just add
the new condition to the existing one. Not sure if it's worth re-spinning
for though.
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> run_one_test(sched);
> + i++;
> + }
>
> sched->thread_funcs_exit = true;
> destroy_tasks(sched);
> @@ -3548,7 +3552,7 @@ int cmd_sched(int argc, const char **argv)
> };
> const struct option replay_options[] = {
> OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &sched.replay_repeat,
> - "repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)"),
> + "repeat the workload replay N times (0: infinite)"),
> OPT_PARENT(sched_options)
> };
> const struct option map_options[] = {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity
2024-06-18 13:04 ` James Clark
@ 2024-06-18 16:09 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy @ 2024-06-18 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Clark
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Ian Rogers, Athira Rajeev,
Chen Yu, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland,
Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, acme,
Fernand Sieber, linux-perf-users, LKML, Madadi Vineeth Reddy
Hi James,
On 18/06/24 18:34, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 18/06/2024 12:29, Madadi Vineeth Reddy wrote:
>> Currently, the -r/--repeat option accepts values from 0 and complains
>> for -1. The help section specifies:
>> -r, --repeat <n> repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)
>>
>
> I was wondering if this was a regression or was always like this but
> it's at least been broken long before it becomes difficult to build
> Perf for me.
>
>> The -r -1 option raises an error because replay_repeat is defined as
>> an unsigned int.
>>
>> In the current implementation, the workload is repeated n times when
>> -r <n> is used, except when n is 0.
>>
>> When -r is set to 0, the workload is also repeated once. This happens
>> because when -r=0, the run_one_test function is not called. (Note that
>> mutex unlocking, which is essential for child threads spawned to emulate
>> the workload, happens in run_one_test.) However, mutex unlocking is
>> still performed in the destroy_tasks function. Thus, -r=0 results in the
>> workload running once coincidentally.
>>
>
> I also saw an intermittent hang waiting in destroy_tasks() which is now
> fixed.
>
>> To clarify and maintain the existing logic for -r >= 1 (which runs the
>> workload the specified number of times) and to fix the issue with infinite
>> runs, make -r=0 perform an infinite run.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt | 7 +++++++
>> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
>> index a216d2991b19..f1be8f0b249e 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-sched.txt
>> @@ -202,6 +202,13 @@ OPTIONS for 'perf sched timehist'
>> --state::
>> Show task state when it switched out.
>>
>> +OPTIONS for 'perf sched replay'
>> +------------------------------
>> +
>> +-r::
>> +--repeat <n>::
>> + repeat the workload n times (0: infinite). Default is 10.
>> +
>> SEE ALSO
>> --------
>> linkperf:perf-record[1]
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> index 8cdf18139a7e..2c4ed5c2d695 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
>> @@ -3383,8 +3383,12 @@ static int perf_sched__replay(struct perf_sched *sched)
>> sched->thread_funcs_exit = false;
>> create_tasks(sched);
>> printf("------------------------------------------------------------\n");
>> - for (i = 0; i < sched->replay_repeat; i++)
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + while (sched->replay_repeat == 0 || i < sched->replay_repeat) {
>
> Very minor nit, but you don't really need to remove the for loop, just add
> the new condition to the existing one. Not sure if it's worth re-spinning
> for though.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>
Thank you for taking a look!
Thanks and Regards
Madadi Vineeth Reddy
>> run_one_test(sched);
>> + i++;
>> + }
>>
>> sched->thread_funcs_exit = true;
>> destroy_tasks(sched);
>> @@ -3548,7 +3552,7 @@ int cmd_sched(int argc, const char **argv)
>> };
>> const struct option replay_options[] = {
>> OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &sched.replay_repeat,
>> - "repeat the workload replay N times (-1: infinite)"),
>> + "repeat the workload replay N times (0: infinite)"),
>> OPT_PARENT(sched_options)
>> };
>> const struct option map_options[] = {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-18 16:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-18 11:29 [PATCH] perf sched replay: Fix -r/--repeat command line option for infinity Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2024-06-18 13:04 ` James Clark
2024-06-18 16:09 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).