From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francis Moreau Subject: Re: perf-probe: issue with latest fedora kernel Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:32:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101209153548.GA11820@ghostprotocols.net> <20101213125837.GB5407@ghostprotocols.net> <20101213142159.GF5407@ghostprotocols.net> <20101213164009.GJ5407@ghostprotocols.net> <20101213191736.GB7984@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:34869 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753739Ab0LMTc7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:32:59 -0500 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so6687636wwa.1 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:32:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101213191736.GB7984@ghostprotocols.net> (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:17:36 -0200") Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > Em Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:08:08PM +0100, Francis Moreau escreveu: >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: >> >> > Em Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 04:11:16PM +0100, Francis Moreau escreveu: > >> >> But as I said, there's no matching build-id. I understand that -k is >> >> currently broken but suppose that it works, which vmlinux should I use >> >> then ? > >> >> $ rpm -qa | grep kernel >> >> kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 >> >> kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 >> >> kernel-headers-2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64 >> >> kernel-devel-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 >> >> kernel-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 > >> > Bzzt, here is the problem: you're not using the right package, >> > kernel-debug-debuginfo is for the kernel-debug package, a kernel built >> > with lots of CONFIG_DEBUG_ options turned on, please install the right >> > package, which is kernel-debuginfo-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 >> >> Ah, that's it. > > Yeah, those package names are a bit confusing :-) > > Please let us know about any other problem you have using these tools, > any feedback is _greatly_ appreciated. Don't worry, I won't miss an opportunity. Thanks -- Francis