From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francis Moreau Subject: Re: perf-probe: issue with latest fedora kernel Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:08:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101209153548.GA11820@ghostprotocols.net> <20101213125837.GB5407@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:54579 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757530Ab0LMNJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:09:01 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so5871741wyb.19 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:09:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101213125837.GB5407@ghostprotocols.net> (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:58:37 -0200") Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > Em Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:02:52AM +0100, Francis Moreau escreveu: >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: >> > Em Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:00:08PM +0100, Francis Moreau escreveu: >> >> I'm trying to use perf-probe(1) with the latest F14 kernel >> >> (2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64). > >> >> I also installed kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64 which >> >> contains the running vmlinux image AFAICT. > >> > Can you try using: > >> > $ perf probe -k /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64.debug/vmlinux > >> > So that it tries it directly instead of looking into the buildid cache? > >> Does anybody know where I can report this issue to Fedora community ? > > Please create a ticket at: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com > > More specifically: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora > > Mention this changeset: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=34d2ea084a3bce03d73ffe64350db2813f07260c > > It will make the -k argument work. > > There is another that will look automatically at this location, but I > haven't merged yet, will post here when done. Hmm, I don't think that any patches recently posted in response of this thread will solve the problem. The primarily concern here, is that the running kernel has a different build-id than the debug image installed by the corresponding debug package. I think it's a distrib issue, hence my question about Fedora report. Thanks -- Francis