From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 4/4] perf ftrace: Support omitting execution duration in function graph tracer
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 23:35:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162512@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006232756.65620-5-atomlin@atomlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf ftrace: --graph-opts duration silently clobbers noduration
--
commit e23672676ea60d48741ccc720b34c8778668c668
Author: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
perf ftrace: Support omitting execution duration in function graph tracer
The Linux kernel's function graph tracer displays the execution duration
of completed functions by default via the funcgraph-duration trace
option. Introduce support for omitting function duration by exposing the
noduration sub-option under --graph-opts (and conversely duration=[0|1]).
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index e11418e619378..88df6b09d9b0d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1754,6 +1772,8 @@ static int parse_graph_tracer_opts(const struct option *opt,
> { .name = "retaddr", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_retaddr },
> { .name = "nosleep-time", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_nosleep_time },
> { .name = "noirqs", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_noirqs },
> + { .name = "noduration", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_noduration },
> + { .name = "duration", .value_ptr = &duration },
> { .name = "verbose", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_verbose },
> { .name = "thresh", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_thresh },
> { .name = "depth", .value_ptr = &ftrace->graph_depth },
> @@ -1769,6 +1789,9 @@ static int parse_graph_tracer_opts(const struct option *opt,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (duration != -1)
> + ftrace->graph_noduration = !duration;
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Does this logic unconditionally overwrite the noduration parameter?
If a user executes perf ftrace with --graph-opts duration=1,noduration, the
token parsing loop in perf_parse_sublevel_options() correctly processes them
sequentially. It sets duration to 1 and ftrace->graph_noduration to 1.
However, since duration != -1 is evaluated after the loop, it overwrites
ftrace->graph_noduration with !1 (which is 0). This causes the duration
parameter to always clobber the noduration parameter, regardless of their
order in the comma-separated list.
Would it be possible to parse both directives strictly in the order they are
specified without unconditionally overriding one after the loop?
> if (filter_retaddr != -1) {
> ftrace->filter_retaddr = (filter_retaddr != 0);
> ftrace->filter_retaddr_set = true;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006232756.65620-1-atomlin@atomlin.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 23:27 [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 0/4] perf ftrace: Support inlined functions and display enhancements in function graph tracer Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:27 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 1/4] perf ftrace: Optimise __cmd_ftrace() stack frame with strbuf streaming Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 15:46 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:27 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 2/4] perf ftrace: Support filtering return address comments Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 16:04 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:27 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 3/4] perf ftrace: Support display of inlined functions in function graph tracer Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 23:27 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 4/4] perf ftrace: Support omitting execution duration " Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-06 23:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 23:24 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v2 0/4] perf ftrace: Support inlined functions and display enhancements " Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162512@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox