Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] perf symbol: Get rid of machine_or_dso_e_machine()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:37:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170240@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013172155.160869-7-namhyung@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf symbol: NULL pointer dereference in dso__load() on error path
--

commit a7899d8622f5885c1647a9ddbd7a9ae67999aeeb
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

perf symbol: Get rid of machine_or_dso_e_machine()

This commit removes the machine_or_dso_e_machine() fallback logic and relies
directly on perf_env__e_machine() for kernel maps. It aims to prevent
recursive locking issues and assumes kernel DSO architectures are correctly
described by the machine environment.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index 56b8d75966133..a7afecb5816c2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1855,7 +1838,7 @@ int dso__load(struct dso *dso, struct map *map)
>  			ret = dso__load_guest_kernel_sym(dso, map);
>  
>  		machine = maps__machine(map__kmaps(map));
> -		if (machine && machine_or_dso_e_machine(machine, dso) == EM_X86_64)
> +		if (perf_env__e_machine(machine->env, /*e_flags=*/NULL) == EM_X86_64)

[Severity: Medium]
Does this code cause a NULL pointer dereference if machine is NULL?

By removing the machine pointer guard, if map__kmaps() returns NULL (for
example, if a kernel DSO is incorrectly associated with a non-kernel map from a
malformed perf.data file), maps__machine() will also return NULL. Passing
machine->env directly to perf_env__e_machine() in this state will then trigger
a segfault.

Could the machine check be restored before attempting to read its environment?

>  			machine__map_x86_64_entry_trampolines(machine, dso);
>  		goto out;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013172155.160869-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 17:21 [PATCH v5 00/11] perf symbol: Properly seto DSO binary/symtab types Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] perf tools: Remove redundant dso data init Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] perf tools: Check ELF section type with name Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] perf tools: Try linked debug files for DSO debug info Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] perf symbol: Update symtab type of vmlinux from build-id cache Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] perf symbol: Set binary/symtab type for split kallsyms Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] perf symbol: Get rid of machine_or_dso_e_machine() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:37   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] perf tools: Factor out dso__find_binary_type() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] perf symbol: Set binary type for JIT map DSOs Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] perf symbol: Do not set binary type from symtab type Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] perf annotate: Simplify symbol__disassemble() with dso binary_type Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] perf test: Fix dso data tests Namhyung Kim
2026-10-13 17:30   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170240@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox