Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 4/5] perf ftrace: Support omitting execution duration in function graph tracer
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:22:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171523@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014161457.373253-5-atomlin@atomlin.com>

> The Linux kernel's function graph tracer displays the execution duration
> of completed functions by default via the funcgraph-duration trace
> option. Whilst informative, in scenarios where the user is solely
> interested in the call graph topology, call flow sequence, or inlined
> hierarchy, the duration column can add visual clutter and widen each
> trace line.
> 
> Introduce support for omitting function duration by exposing the
> noduration sub-option under --graph-opts. Consistent with the existing
> nosleep-time and noirqs sub-options, it accepts an optional value, so
> noduration=0 explicitly retains the duration column; when specified
> more than once, the last occurrence takes effect. When enabled, perf
> ftrace configures the kernel's tracing instance option
> funcgraph-duration to 0, and restores it to 1 upon resetting tracing
> options.
> 
> Because the profile subcommand fundamentally requires function execution
> duration to compute timing statistics and call counts, combining
> noduration with perf ftrace profile is rejected with an explicit error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014161457.373253-1-atomlin@atomlin.com?part=4


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 16:14 [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 0/5] perf ftrace: Support inlined functions and display enhancements in function graph tracer Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:14 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 1/5] perf ftrace: Optimise __cmd_ftrace() stack frame with strbuf streaming Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:41     ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:14 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 2/5] perf ftrace: Support filtering return address comments Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 18:13     ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:14 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 3/5] perf ftrace: Support display of inlined functions in function graph tracer Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 16:14 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 4/5] perf ftrace: Support omitting execution duration " Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 16:14 ` [PATCH perf-tools-next v4 5/5] perf ftrace: Filter extraneous functions " Aaron Tomlin
2026-10-14 16:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171523@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox