From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C1D818DB26 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792110290; cv=none; b=lVSHNbdbiEAvXcnOJ5D5Slu3HYg23ff6ksmkKRx0WPRDTY6LV2/JJPwCn82Azw2PjeJ9XQ/pdngldKUev5slKqhf8Dxshscfa6ihtt8FQxT29lfx4doVuNIFq63Bt2qw0zvbp/73NA3YFWlTe6QkuEyPliUnG5NrQoOe6jhype8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792110290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp2O06VhCkbLjCHECD+I2mhazBU5EfYYBUZFQNqPL6o=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=TDwoKP5VVuIrAxSw8eTmW44bnduQoY7QNL914C7BaDqZ8985J8x4Ho8prqS1joEQfSWBEn8fusYk7j1ZGgffqzUJID1wB/AZAUtdr0TNcxP5EaCczxfjvU2AowlfVW6QGHUmJilLqjYpyxz3j53F/mAOJVgPbHY6CLeWz/NV/DA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=glbVfET2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="glbVfET2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C39C1F000C4; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792110288; bh=gp2O06VhCkbLjCHECD+I2mhazBU5EfYYBUZFQNqPL6o=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=glbVfET2zXL3/OkKCLyxaJKMGbUIlR2ug0Clb3JYDmnnYFF4vt5FGNg0DKMSSlcI7 bl7/M3u66FUxDzCKlWifghJTOP8sE6WZ1an+33NQdT2TOkKfe2+1dfJv0vm9IbNaKN VPoTIKhph0qSjV0WaRMArtdAaom3oPfzR2kdlc5eH+IuT5t0mcYLj8Gx0welLzoTF+ Omppil/mkSosCeTnlIFf5HQ/MdltnzzJ4K2+q92meswKR+DA93kx+gPg07ywH7NBtq QaIoYPR1P8h1DDOFYfUQTdKO7Ekw4lS9pkbi4jgqq33p0yH6JtwTSWqfgYNYvNwsir 1xaJjMbYQMHug== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/19] perf tests: Mark the C tests mapping perf ring buffers Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261016001843.71978-17-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261016001843.71978-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261016001843.71978-17-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:24:48 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > The C tests that run 'perf record' in the test process itself map ring > buffers and so need room in the per user budget set in > kernel.perf_event_mlock_kb: mark them with the new 'needs_mlock' suite > flag, read by the turnstile added later in the series, so that they > take turns using that budget while the tests that don't map them keep > running in parallel. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016001843.7197= 8-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D16