Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:31:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016001843.71978-9-acme@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf: fd leak in evsel__open_cpu() on missing feature fallback
--

commit 4b54c2ca3d287fefa4e358bd15bc06b547bbe8da
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR

This commit prevents support probe events from being dumped into the
$PERF_TEST_ATTR event files. It introduces a support_probe flag to identify
events opened strictly to query supported features.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/asWQvXRdqp_RK85c@google.com/

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index e61f309e93dcc..59318fef03cb1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,11 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
>  
>  			bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, idx, fd);
>  
> -			if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled())) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Support probes aren't what was asked for, leave them
> +			 * out of the PERF_TEST_ATTR dump.
> +			 */
> +			if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled() && !evsel->support_probe)) {

[Severity: Medium]
Does this code leak file descriptors when a missing feature fallback is
triggered on a subsequent loop iteration?

If sys_perf_event_open() succeeds on a capable CPU and records the file
descriptor, but then fails on an incapable CPU, the code jumps to restart
the loop:

evsel__open_cpu() {
    ...
fallback_missing_features:
    evsel__disable_missing_features(evsel);
    ...
    for (idx = start_cpu_map_idx; idx < end_cpu_map_idx; idx++) {
        ...
        for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
            ...
            fd = sys_perf_event_open(...);
            FD(evsel, idx, thread) = fd;
            if (fd < 0) {
                err = -errno;
                goto try_fallback;
            }
            ...
try_fallback:
    ...
    if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel, cpu))
        goto fallback_missing_features;
}

When evsel__detect_missing_features() triggers the jump back to
fallback_missing_features, it appears the loop restarts from
start_cpu_map_idx without routing through out_close to clean up the
previously opened file descriptors. Can this leak the file descriptors when
the array entries are overwritten?

>  				test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpu,
>  						fd, group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
>  			}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016001843.71978-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16  0:18 [PATCH v3 0/19] perf test attr: Report the failures again and cope with more than one core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] perf test attr: Fix record dwarf sample_type expectation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] perf test attr: Allow tests to require a core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] perf test attr: Fix default stat metrics expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] perf test attr: Relax group checking for ungrouped expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] perf evsel: Mark the event as supported when retrying an open Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] perf test attr: Ignore the core PMU type perf puts in 'config' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] perf test attr: Introduce mask_bits(), generalizing hide_core_pmu_type() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] perf test attr: Accept either sample id bit perf asks for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] perf test attr: Ignore the dummy tracking event and the terms it carries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] perf test attr: Leave out the events of the other core PMUs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] perf test attr: Ignore the group read_format bit the PMU count can remove Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] perf test attr: State, spelled out in a line, why a test is skipped Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] perf tests: Introduce a 'needs_mlock' suite flag Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] perf tests: Mark the C tests mapping perf ring buffers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] perf tests: Mark the shell tests not " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] perf mutex: Add a robust, process-shared mutex initializer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] perf test: Take turns using the perf mlock budget in the mmaping tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16  0:28   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox