From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:31:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016001843.71978-9-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf: fd leak in evsel__open_cpu() on missing feature fallback
--
commit 4b54c2ca3d287fefa4e358bd15bc06b547bbe8da
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR
This commit prevents support probe events from being dumped into the
$PERF_TEST_ATTR event files. It introduces a support_probe flag to identify
events opened strictly to query supported features.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/asWQvXRdqp_RK85c@google.com/
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index e61f309e93dcc..59318fef03cb1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,11 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
>
> bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, idx, fd);
>
> - if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled())) {
> + /*
> + * Support probes aren't what was asked for, leave them
> + * out of the PERF_TEST_ATTR dump.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled() && !evsel->support_probe)) {
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code leak file descriptors when a missing feature fallback is
triggered on a subsequent loop iteration?
If sys_perf_event_open() succeeds on a capable CPU and records the file
descriptor, but then fails on an incapable CPU, the code jumps to restart
the loop:
evsel__open_cpu() {
...
fallback_missing_features:
evsel__disable_missing_features(evsel);
...
for (idx = start_cpu_map_idx; idx < end_cpu_map_idx; idx++) {
...
for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
...
fd = sys_perf_event_open(...);
FD(evsel, idx, thread) = fd;
if (fd < 0) {
err = -errno;
goto try_fallback;
}
...
try_fallback:
...
if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel, cpu))
goto fallback_missing_features;
}
When evsel__detect_missing_features() triggers the jump back to
fallback_missing_features, it appears the loop restarts from
start_cpu_map_idx without routing through out_close to clean up the
previously opened file descriptors. Can this leak the file descriptors when
the array entries are overwritten?
> test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpu,
> fd, group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016001843.71978-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 0:18 [PATCH v3 0/19] perf test attr: Report the failures again and cope with more than one core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] perf test attr: Fix record dwarf sample_type expectation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] perf test attr: Allow tests to require a core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] perf test attr: Fix default stat metrics expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] perf test attr: Relax group checking for ungrouped expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] perf evsel: Mark the event as supported when retrying an open Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] perf test attr: Ignore the core PMU type perf puts in 'config' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] perf test attr: Introduce mask_bits(), generalizing hide_core_pmu_type() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] perf test attr: Accept either sample id bit perf asks for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] perf test attr: Ignore the dummy tracking event and the terms it carries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] perf test attr: Leave out the events of the other core PMUs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] perf test attr: Ignore the group read_format bit the PMU count can remove Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] perf test attr: State, spelled out in a line, why a test is skipped Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] perf tests: Introduce a 'needs_mlock' suite flag Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] perf tests: Mark the C tests mapping perf ring buffers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] perf tests: Mark the shell tests not " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] perf mutex: Add a robust, process-shared mutex initializer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] perf test: Take turns using the perf mlock budget in the mmaping tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox