From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF3035C69F for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792189252; cv=none; b=MAaF4z0SvhApFwtb8itIaJknvQhqXPDBDIuMazG8HjUatbaUEwIL9uYd9hPytAIhFGw6yzhI4vRndESK0wmXdYOWmVitqKbmC7KZgRhgUgDOJPl92+6ukMeFnwjWn1/8Y80w442UgvmYhlOHWEg9R9ZxhijXl/0ginqvbsdt/6M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792189252; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y+YMe9y4HuCnLLynJECyhkO1+x2idP0QGfTkLwCJDlk=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=GQxBdYDPC/LLcOqTgvxaziRTTtk3ZhM1o1mDPUtokDBOwaDIURjYgkTguLsBKWfyGyr/FNGc8fzM5OdEJuq4g8pn+2m/IQkgpdQDysAN6OtQY61Yga/Pv3rK0STRi61kPjRnxmrdN+o9lbnxwcTPGQMTzd5qvDA4TNOS1KVdOTs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XmiSz73v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XmiSz73v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E09581F000C4; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:20:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792189251; bh=y+YMe9y4HuCnLLynJECyhkO1+x2idP0QGfTkLwCJDlk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=XmiSz73vb6M7u5+OdFSm/NjCI3eSrvMJ9YylppklHXOi0sbrYUS/W+3dPk9C3wfEy upae4bnNcK09pFyrFzHG1FS4h7QqHJlDj4H4V70Xc7mfPvO+rhfL3v+H780gViqLtM cmnYqFNODZ0AsOdvaJlE/x8p8ZMuJ9pSF+gj1Y2Ri5poWYVkgJ3dGfKc0XTLilDs8Q IghAHiekQUGXv2rHKx2874SFRKSQgKfF5cTgXQxhIZCLPNP/5paI1FZcGgPJ08QdL2 o3W8vi3zHojy37vBISin9KfFVpkOFJ+VeNcXwi2FP5bTmeF0lGr2UQq+Ilz0Mm485k XsdsIbf8lXxpg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/17] perf comm: Add __guarded_by annotations to struct comm_strs Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ian Rogers" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261016221700.1282659-7-irogers@google.com> References: <20261016173106.679725-1-irogers@google.com> <20261016221700.1282659-1-irogers@google.com> <20261016221700.1282659-7-irogers@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:20:50 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Annotate strs, num_strs, and capacity in struct comm_strs with > __guarded_by(&lock) and __pt_guarded_by(&lock) so Clang verifies all > accesses hold comm_strs->lock. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016221700.1282= 659-1-irogers@google.com?part=3D6