From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] perf tools: Verify thread status and mount namespace inode
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:28:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182413@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023071141.134149-6-namhyung@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf namespaces: nsinfo__init() clobbers tgid and pidns on TID recycling
- [Medium] perf namespaces: nsinfo__mountns_enter() sets exited on mntns inode change
--
commit da6e91e676149798d39ba6f5e75c0b31c436121c
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf tools: Verify thread status and mount namespace inode
This commit verifies that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/status exists and has a
matching Tgid before accessing a thread's namespaces to guard against PID/TID
recycling, and records the mount namespace inode to verify it via fstat() when
entering the namespace.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/namespaces.c b/tools/perf/util/namespaces.c
> index 843d075d30409..bb119a6cc6064 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/namespaces.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/namespaces.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -103,17 +105,34 @@ int nsinfo__init(struct nsinfo *nsi)
> struct stat new_stat;
> int rv = -1;
>
> - if (!nsi)
> + if (!nsi || RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->exited)
> return -1;
>
> RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->inited = true;
>
> + /*
> + * Verify that the thread (pid, tid) still exists in /proc and its Tgid
> + * matches pid (guarding against PID/TID recycling), while resolving the
> + * innermost tgid if the process is in a different PID namespace.
> + */
> + if (snprintf(spath, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%d/task/%d/status",
> + nsinfo__pid(nsi), nsinfo__tid(nsi)) >= PATH_MAX)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rv = nsinfo__get_nspid(&RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->tgid, &RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->nstgid,
> + &RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->in_pidns, spath);
> + if (rv < 0 || RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->tgid != nsinfo__pid(nsi)) {
> + nsinfo__set_exited(nsi);
> + rv = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can this overwrite tgid, nstgid, and in_pidns with an unrelated process's
values when PID/TID recycling is detected?
In nsinfo__new_thread(pid, tid), tgid and nstgid are initialized to pid and
in_pidns to false as fallback values in case the thread exits before /proc is
queried.
If a process with pid == tid exits before lazy initialization in
nsinfo__init(), and its ID is recycled as a non-leader thread of an unrelated
process P2, /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/status still resolves in procfs because
both refer to the same thread group.
In that case, nsinfo__get_nspid() succeeds and writes P2's Tgid, NStgid, and
in_pidns directly into nsi before the tgid != nsinfo__pid(nsi) check detects
the mismatch. Calling nsinfo__set_exited(nsi) marks exited = true and clears
need_setns, but leaves the overwritten tgid, nstgid, and in_pidns in place.
Downstream callers that query an exited nsinfo via nsinfo__tgid(),
nsinfo__nstgid(), nsinfo__in_pidns(), or nsinfo__copy(), such as
dso__find_perf_map() in tools/perf/util/symbol.c:
if (!nsinfo__need_setns(nsi)) {
...
nsinfo__clear_need_setns(nnsi);
snprintf(filebuf, bufsz, "/tmp/perf-%d.map", nsinfo__tgid(nnsi));
as well as jr_entry_pid() and jit_detect() in tools/perf/util/jitdump.c, will
then use P2's identifiers instead of the original process's pid.
Should nsinfo__init() read into local variables first, similar to
nsinfo__check_proc(), and only update nsi after verifying that tgid matches
nsinfo__pid(nsi)?
[ ... ]
> @@ -273,15 +285,44 @@ void nsinfo__clear_need_setns(struct nsinfo *nsi)
> zfree(&RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->mntns_path);
> }
>
> -void nsinfo__reset_init(struct nsinfo *nsi)
> +void nsinfo__set_exited(struct nsinfo *nsi)
> {
> if (!nsi)
> return;
>
> + RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->exited = true;
> + nsinfo__clear_need_setns(nsi);
> +}
> +
> +void nsinfo__reset_init(struct nsinfo *nsi)
> +{
> + if (!nsi || RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->exited)
> + return;
> +
> nsinfo__clear_need_setns(nsi);
> RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->inited = false;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -339,16 +384,26 @@ void nsinfo__mountns_enter(struct nsinfo *nsi,
> if (!oldcwd)
> return;
>
> - oldns = open("/proc/self/ns/mnt", O_RDONLY);
> - if (oldns < 0)
> - goto errout;
> + if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->need_setns) {
> + struct stat st;
> +
> + oldns = open("/proc/self/ns/mnt", O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (oldns < 0)
> + goto errout;
>
> - newns = open(nsinfo__mntns_path(nsi), O_RDONLY);
> - if (newns < 0)
> - goto errout;
> + newns = open(nsinfo__mntns_path(nsi), O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (newns < 0)
> + goto errout;
>
> - if (setns(newns, CLONE_NEWNS) < 0)
> - goto errout;
> + if (fstat(newns, &st) < 0 ||
> + st.st_ino != RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->mntns_ino) {
> + nsinfo__set_exited(nsi);
> + goto errout;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
What happens if a live thread changes its mount namespace via
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) or setns(..., CLONE_NEWNS)?
If a thread in a non-root mount namespace is initialized via nsinfo__init()
and later changes its mount namespace while still alive, procfs immediately
updates the inode of /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/ns/mnt.
If perf symbolizes an earlier sample or loads a DSO via
dso__load() -> nsinfo__mountns_enter() before the corresponding
PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES or exec PERF_RECORD_COMM event is processed,
nsinfo__check_proc(nsi) succeeds because the thread is still alive with
Tgid == pid, but fstat(newns, &st) sees st.st_ino != nsi->mntns_ino and calls
nsinfo__set_exited(nsi).
Because dso->nsinfo shares the thread's struct nsinfo via
nsinfo__get(thread__nsinfo(thread)) in map__new(), setting exited = true
causes subsequent calls to nsinfo__reset_init() in thread__set_namespaces()
and __thread__set_comm() to return early without resetting inited, permanently
disabling mount namespace entry and nsinfo__check_proc() checks for the rest
of the thread's lifetime.
Should a mount namespace inode mismatch here call nsinfo__clear_need_setns(nsi)
instead of nsinfo__set_exited(nsi) so that a subsequent namespace or exec
event can still re-initialize the thread's nsinfo?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023071141.134149-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 7:11 [PATCH v1 00/11] perf tools: Enhance namespace and chroot handling Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] perf tools: Add HEADER_BOOT_ID feature Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] perf tools: Add perf_env__is_same_boot() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] perf tools: Add nsinfo__new_thread() to track tid Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] perf tools: Defer /proc lookup until nsinfo is used Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] perf tools: Verify thread status and mount namespace inode Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] perf tools: Check thread liveness when accessing /proc Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] perf tools: Handle chroot inside nsinfo__mountns_enter() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] perf tools: Export filename__read_build_id_ns() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] perf tools: Remove redundant chroot handling Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] perf tools: Only enter mount namespace if necessary Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:11 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] perf tools: Scope mount namespace entry in dso__load() Namhyung Kim
2026-10-23 7:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182413@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox