Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Amir Ayupov" <aaupov@fb.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add pmuv3_event_implemented()
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 06:47:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-184102@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd3e622681f7254216b0488f09d2cb2d91a2d8ca.1792907333.git.aaupov@fb.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] perf: arm_pmuv3: circular header inclusion in pmuv3_event_implemented()
--

commit fe846ad9d18510169af8401fb7c59990c15ea903
Author: Amir Ayupov <aaupov@fb.com>

perf: arm_pmuv3: Add pmuv3_event_implemented()

This commit adds pmuv3_event_implemented() to include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
to allow drivers outside the PMU driver to check whether the local CPU's PMU
implements a common event via PMCEID0/1, and moves
ARMV8_PMUV3_EXT_COMMON_EVENT_BASE into include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h.

> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
> index d698efba28a27..965c40b28dd77 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h

[ ... ]

> @@ -315,4 +318,23 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/arm_pmuv3.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * Whether this CPU's PMU implements a common event, as reported by
> + * PMCEID{0,1}: events 0x0000-0x003f in bits [31:0], and from PMUv3p1 events
> + * 0x4000-0x403f in bits [63:32], which read as zero before PMUv3p1.
> + * Must run on the CPU whose PMU is queried.
> + */
> +static inline bool pmuv3_event_implemented(u16 event)
> +{
> +	bool ext = event >= ARMV8_PMUV3_EXT_COMMON_EVENT_BASE;
> +	u16 id = ext ? event - ARMV8_PMUV3_EXT_COMMON_EVENT_BASE : event;
> +	u64 pmceid;
> +
> +	if (id >= 64 || !pmuv3_implemented(read_pmuver()))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	pmceid = id < 32 ? read_pmceid0() : read_pmceid1();
> +	return pmceid & BIT_ULL(id % 32 + (ext ? 32 : 0));
> +}

[Severity: Low]
Does defining pmuv3_event_implemented() here break arm64 builds due to a
circular header dependency when a translation unit includes
<asm/arm_pmuv3.h> before <asm/kvm_host.h> or <linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h>?

For example, arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c includes <asm/arm_pmuv3.h>
first:

    #include <asm/arm_pmuv3.h>
    #include <asm/cpu.h>
    #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
    #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
    #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
    #include <asm/hwcap.h>
    #include <asm/insn.h>
    #include <asm/kvm_host.h>

In arch/arm64/include/asm/arm_pmuv3.h, the header guard __ASM_PMUV3_H is
defined and <asm/kvm_host.h> is included at the top before read_pmuver(),
read_pmceid0(), read_pmceid1(), and pmuv3_implemented() are defined:

    #ifndef __ASM_PMUV3_H
    #define __ASM_PMUV3_H

    #include <asm/kvm_host.h>

That triggers the inclusion chain:

    arch/arm64/include/asm/arm_pmuv3.h
      -> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
        -> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
          -> include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h

When include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h reaches #include <asm/arm_pmuv3.h>, it
is skipped because __ASM_PMUV3_H is already defined, so
pmuv3_event_implemented() is compiled before pmuv3_implemented(),
read_pmuver(), read_pmceid0(), and read_pmceid1() have been declared.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1792907332.git.aaupov@fb.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-25  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20261012230527.750567-1-aaupov@fb.com>
2026-10-25  6:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] coresight: Pulse an ETM external output for a PMU event Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] coresight: etm4x: Fix event count decoding Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:45     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] coresight: syscfg: Fail to enable a configuration not loaded on the device Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:46     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] coresight: syscfg: Match feature capabilities separately from device class Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:44     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 4/7] coresight: syscfg: Remove unused CS_CFG_MATCH_INST_ANY Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:42     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 5/7] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add pmuv3_event_implemented() Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:47     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-25 17:05     ` kernel test robot
2026-10-26  0:43     ` kernel test robot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 6/7] coresight: etm4x: Report whether the PMU counts the external outputs Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:46     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-25  6:39   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] coresight: Add pmu_pulse/extout_pulse Amir Ayupov
2026-10-25  6:50     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  5:48   ` [PATCH v4 0/7] coresight: Pulse an ETM external output for a PMU event Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 1/7] coresight: etm4x: Fix event count decoding Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:42       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:37       ` James Clark
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 2/7] coresight: syscfg: Fail to enable a configuration not loaded on the device Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:48       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 3/7] coresight: syscfg: Match feature capabilities separately from device class Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:49       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:45       ` James Clark
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 4/7] coresight: syscfg: Remove unused CS_CFG_MATCH_INST_ANY Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:41       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:45       ` James Clark
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 5/7] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add pmuv3_event_implemented() Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:45       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:47       ` James Clark
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 6/7] coresight: etm4x: Report whether the PMU counts the external outputs Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:48       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:49       ` James Clark
2026-10-26  5:48     ` [PATCH v4 7/7] coresight: Add pmu_pulse/extout_pulse Amir Ayupov
2026-10-26  8:50       ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26  9:50       ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-184102@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaupov@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox