Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Houghton" <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] perf/core: Don't unwind the user stack without an mm
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:58:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-185771@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026215226.3713941-6-jthoughton@google.com>

> get_perf_callchain() only checks is_user_task(current) when the regs it
> is given aren't user mode regs. However, BPF's bpf_get_task_stack() (and
> bpf_get_task_stack_sleepable()) pass task_pt_regs(current) when called on
> the current task, which are user mode regs for a user task, even if that
> task has already gone through exit_mm(), e.g. when called from a program
> attached to exit_files() or to the dying task's final sched_switch.
> 
> perf_callchain_user() then unwinds the user stack without an mm. That
> access does not reliably fail: the user half of the address space
> belongs to whatever mm happens to be lazily loaded, if any, so the
> unwinder may read another task's memory. This affects e.g. arm64,
> riscv, loongarch and csky, whose perf_callchain_user() doesn't check
> current->mm itself. perf events themselves are not affected, as
> perf_callchain() already clears the user callchain request when
> current is not a user task with an mm.
> 
> Check is_user_task(current) regardless of the regs' mode.
> 
> Fixes: fa28dcb82a38 ("bpf: Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack()")
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026215226.3713941-1-jthoughton@google.com?part=5


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-26 21:52 [RFC PATCH 00/10] uaccess: Refuse and warn on user accesses when current->mm is NULL James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] scsi: bsg: Don't copy sense data to user memory when canceled James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27  2:41   ` Jens Axboe
2026-10-27 17:52     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] btrfs: Don't copy encoded read " James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27  2:42   ` Jens Axboe
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] bpf: Fail sleepable user copy helpers when current->mm is NULL James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 22:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-27 18:50     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] stacktrace: Don't unwind the user stack without an mm James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 22:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-26 22:55     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] perf/core: " James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:58   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 11:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 17:45     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] uaccess: Refuse and warn on user copies when current->mm is NULL James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 22:42   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-26 23:41     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] uaccess: Fail user nofault helpers quietly " James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] uaccess: Refuse and warn on __copy_from_user_inatomic() without an mm James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 22:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-26 22:41     ` James Houghton
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] uaccess: Refuse and warn on more user accesses " James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] uaccess: Move the NULL mm warning out of line James Houghton
2026-10-26 22:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 23:02   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-26 23:51     ` James Houghton
2026-10-27  0:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] uaccess: Refuse and warn on user accesses when current->mm is NULL Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-27 10:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-27 17:29   ` James Houghton
2026-10-27 18:32     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-27 21:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-27 23:17       ` James Houghton
2026-10-28 23:13         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-185771@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox