From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: do not call list_for_each_entry_safe() on uninitalized list
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 10:16:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-197072@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104100802.539266-2-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf tests: uninitialized err list in test__pmu_config_helpers()
--
commit 779f6d6b7e775ad26417497420edb0cda7bafa6c
Author: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
perf: do not call list_for_each_entry_safe() on uninitalized list
This commit adds an err_out_pmu cleanup label in test__pmu_config_helpers()
so that an early evlist__new() allocation failure skips calling
parse_events_terms__exit(&terms) before parse_events_terms__init(&terms) has
run.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> index 13e8d7fa80af2..be984e1385df2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int test__pmu_config_helpers(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> evlist = evlist__new();
> if (evlist == NULL) {
> pr_err("Failed allocation");
> - goto err_out;
> + goto err_out_pmu;
> }
>
> parse_events_terms__init(&terms);
> @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int test__pmu_config_helpers(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> err_out:
> parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
> evlist__put(evlist);
> +err_out_pmu:
> test_pmu_put(dir, pmu);
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Should test__pmu_config_helpers() in tools/perf/tests/pmu.c be initializing
and cleaning up err instead of terms?
Looking at test__pmu_config_helpers(), both terms and config_terms appear to
be unused remnants, whereas err is passed to parse_events(),
parse_events_error__print(), and parse_events_error__contains() without
parse_events_error__init(&err) or parse_events_error__exit(&err) ever being
called:
struct parse_events_terms terms;
struct parse_events_error err;
LIST_HEAD(config_terms);
...
parse_events_terms__init(&terms);
ret = parse_events(evlist, event, &err);
if (ret) {
pr_debug("failed to parse event '%s', err %d\n", event, ret);
parse_events_error__print(&err, event);
if (parse_events_error__contains(&err, "can't access trace events"))
ret = TEST_SKIP;
goto err_out;
}
...
err_out:
parse_events_terms__exit(&terms);
evlist__put(evlist);
When parse_events() fails and records an error via
parse_events_error__handle(), list_add(&entry->list, &err->list) and the
subsequent list_for_each_entry() walks in parse_events_error__print() and
parse_events_error__contains() will dereference the uninitialized err.list
pointers on the stack, and any allocated parse_events_error_entry objects
will be leaked.
Instead of keeping the unused terms variable, should terms and config_terms
be removed and parse_events_terms__init(&terms) /
parse_events_terms__exit(&terms) be replaced with
parse_events_error__init(&err) and parse_events_error__exit(&err)?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104100802.539266-1-jirislaby@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 10:08 [PATCH 1/2] perf: do not call zfree() on uninitialized pointer Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-11-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: do not call list_for_each_entry_safe() on uninitalized list Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-11-04 10:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 10:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: do not call zfree() on uninitialized pointer sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-197072@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox