From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 15/20] perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 05:58:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-200872@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106043257.842864-16-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] perf/x86/intel: unrefreshed or clobbered LBR stack on
indirect PEBS drain
--
commit f13e61130af8b47007c91f048b386359760f05ad
Author: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed
This commit tracks whether the shared LBR stack has been refreshed during PMI
handling with a lbr_refreshed flag and removes the unconditional LBR read at
PMI entry so the live LBR state is read on demand for non-PEBS LBR events and
re-read if PEBS draining overwrites it.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index fbde874af6182..b267c68f94676 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4003,8 +4013,19 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> *
> * The PEBS buffer has to be drained before handling the A-PMI
> */
> - if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event))
> + if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event)) {
> + /*
> + * PEBS counter sampling is only supported on adaptive PEBS
> + * and arch-PEBS, both of which snapshot the LBR stack.
> + * No explicit LBR refresh is needed here.
> + */
> static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
> + /*
> + * Draining the PEBS buffer can overwrite the shared
> + * LBR stack, so mark lbr_refreshed as false.
> + */
> + lbr_refreshed = false;
> + }
>
> last_period = event->hw.last_period;
>
> @@ -4013,8 +4034,14 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
>
> perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, last_period);
>
> - if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
> + if (!lbr_refreshed) {
> + intel_pmu_lbr_read(cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc),
> + cpuc->lbr_counters);
> + lbr_refreshed = true;
> + }
> intel_pmu_lbr_save_brstack(&data, cpuc, event);
> + }
>
> x86_pmu_clear_perf_regs(regs);
> x86_pmu_update_perf_regs(event, &data, regs, false);
[Severity: Medium]
Can perf_event_overflow() still drain the PEBS buffer and clobber
cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc) when is_pebs_counter_event_group(event) is false?
When a non-PEBS event using PERF_SAMPLE_READ | PERF_FORMAT_GROUP is grouped
with a PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD PEBS LBR sibling (without
PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_CNTR set on the leader), perf_event_overflow() ->
perf_output_sample() -> perf_output_read_group() -> intel_pmu_read_event()
calls intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer() before PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK is
written. Draining pending PEBS records calls intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(),
which overwrites cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc) before the current non-PEBS sample
copies data.br_stack and leaves lbr_refreshed set to true for any subsequent
non-PEBS LBR events in the same PMI.
In addition, because the unconditional intel_pmu_lbr_read() at PMI entry is
removed, an indirect PEBS drain on pre-adaptive PEBS
(!x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline) when GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT is clear
will run intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() against an unrefreshed
cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106043257.842864-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com?part=15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 4:32 [Patch v6 00/20] perf/x86: Fix multiple LBR sampling issues Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 01/20] perf/x86: Disable LBR if x86_pmu.lbr_nr exceeds MAX_LBR_ENTRIES Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 02/20] perf/x86/intel: Validate LBR XSAVE state before updating LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 03/20] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 04/20] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 05/20] perf/x86: Add lbr_enabled to track LBR state Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 06/20] perf/x86/amd: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:07 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 07/20] perf/x86/intel: Add helper to enable PMU without LBR Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 08/20] perf/x86/intel: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 09/20] perf/x86/intel: Keep LBR frozen throughout PMI handling Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 10/20] perf: Add counted-bounds tracking for perf_branch_stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 11/20] perf/x86/intel: Allow LBR read helpers to operate on explicit stacks Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 12/20] perf/x86/intel: Use a dedicated LBR stack for BPF snapshotting Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 13/20] perf/x86/intel: Always snapshot live hardware LBR state for BPF Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 14/20] perf/x86/amd: Refresh LBR stack in PMI only when LBR users are active Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 15/20] perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 6:54 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 16/20] perf/x86/intel: Remove dead lbr_pebs_users Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 17/20] perf/x86/intel: Clear raw LBR counters in the LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 18/20] perf/x86/intel: Refill LBR stack for LBR counter events in PMI handler Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 19/20] perf/x86/intel: Pass LBR stack size into store_lbr() Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 20/20] perf/core: Don't overwrite shared LBR stack depth Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:23 ` [Patch v6 00/20] perf/x86: Fix multiple LBR sampling issues Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-200872@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox