From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794384184; b=TzT5py4gZlQ4cQ8F5lpiXQhV8GTV5DUU3fufm4LxAZ/4jaWkdAjmHzGlwjrVPT4dTt5z avBwA8ZD9Fx7LlklR5a5mFGKA35V1HSDym8/v4UQ0UMEY0/B3DS6Gq4TuoW1b3gn8yr0q e4Vv7jgVaa9wLo1lJlhx7Ac7jK1H3qrnjo9ibNyPQehSGRNxBOGC/QLi0qlPB5Hq3P8QP yt4O12QkjY100OuX92jzbVkIWSg+sO6DpHlmcp9eoCEi8r0GsryGaVn1f1jbXcuk2OaZI pnUr0nfzLrGwvOaTzT9PJqdnSI0HU3Omvd5z0iXx5CG/u5Y/29KZa03jtlecLlurOug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794384184; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=mHK41UdYKOvdp1SeMhXE4mlrGMLg3Ar3ZmU1ioTSmqA=; b=EafkI8tJLaETRqNM45zDLd0/Y9IGp9xnoQwxPXPWe9TVEYf6EdjRrUL0I9mX1Fnk79zN pDUAvKNlqNX7BQR+eeHR5TpOFqempN4clzOXUAEhU6HyD8hBmEYllXEONG/frPr9e4HAA EnHhbhzyIpZ5cKQvg4KVKtAbg65GnBLIeVq/Xt4fW6AC+kPpcV+PwrVgHhQ14Eey6vGha B5bot2mmBV2sHTbN9l4w8CngSy1h+uobFtpbFOT+8VQHrgpRoPc/BhaDz/Z213qWDflqA 65jWDnpqexEVBLfcaDVyUnX4wd8zVrZnQM3Y0K9SeBLdLG9khws5C9r5Okzu4cPPo7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=oUdyc0jM; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39B0606A320 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=oUdyc0jM Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6952D1F00A05; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:03:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794384184; bh=mHK41UdYKOvdp1SeMhXE4mlrGMLg3Ar3ZmU1ioTSmqA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=oUdyc0jMBh/kjw+4iaIZXWMJWH4odQg9258KtkgCfu09Pl+m9p4IJGC3hzunt9Mpz T+bzZKWn4KfkCSZvpUZ8A5eJ5kjOHv4tQow4ysXUakrtyRpbsDKh+yrZes6uHx6FCD FPnpFGtAE7d4koou3rJO/PKgOWgt3pWjkBhTxaOqRla0ebst0LmoGSzM28tAJGsb7z yXQqIUsOID0pQExgIxwSHnQK2QXf5vVAoA52o+wjPGXafsj0s69i5IVp3n1ByxcJDt tkBKMtNFUDFvwFsON7OdeZNmB8tQ+E2CGdGRt7hPy6sZ5ufat/cfoRvgoJRegWPsgc RMs8r2+Sr0EZg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch_topology: Use cpumask_intersects where applicable Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Shrikanth Hegde" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261111075945.3930230-6-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> References: <20261111075945.3930230-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> <20261111075945.3930230-6-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:03:03 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > Looping over one cpumask and checking if any bit is set in another > cpumask is same as evaluating if two cpumasks intersects or not. >=20 > So use cpumask_intersects instead. It is probably faster too. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111075945.3930= 230-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com?part=3D5