From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/12] perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213083@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113150555.1163049-7-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] perf test: missing DWARF feature check in annotate_stats.sh
without libdw
--
commit a3aa8082d0e5c5ce9cb6c085dad08c8447fc23aa
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations
This commit moves the printing of data type and instruction stats in
perf annotate to after the annotation loops and adds a shell test for
instruction stats.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000000..82d2becdff141
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh
[ ... ]
> +if ! perf annotate --code-with-type --insn-stat -i "$perfdata" --stdio \
> + --percent-limit 1 > "$perfout" 2>/dev/null; then
> + echo "FAIL: perf annotate"
> + cleanup
> + exit 1
> +fi
> +
> +# The instruction stats are accounted while the instructions are
> +# displayed; printing them before the display loop shows zeros.
> +if ! grep -Eq '^total [1-9][0-9]*,' "$perfout"; then
> + echo "FAIL: instruction stats not accounted"
> + cleanup
> + exit 1
> +fi
[Severity: Low]
Will this test fail with exit status 1 instead of skipping when perf is
built without libdw dwarf support (HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT)?
Unlike --data-type, --code-with-type does not exit early when
HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT is disabled. Instead, debuginfo__new() returns NULL,
so annotation_line__print() skips __hist_entry__get_data_type() and
prints "total 0". Checking "perf check feature -q dwarf" before running
the test, as in data_type_register.sh, would skip cleanly with exit
status 2.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113150555.1163049-1-acme@kernel.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 15:05 [PATCH v1 0/12] perf coverage: A harness for perf, and the fixes it found Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] perf scripts: Add a coverage harness for perf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] perf annotate-data: Resolve DW_OP_addrx global variables Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] perf tests: Exercise the flexible array member path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] perf annotate-data: Count flexible array accesses for the whole struct Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] perf tests: Exercise data type resolution from a register Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] perf tests: Silence the libbfd probe in build-test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] perf build: Record the display-only features in FEATURE-DUMP Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] perf cs-etm: Fall back to the recorded instruction size on a failed read Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:15 ` Leo Yan
2026-11-13 15:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] perf tests: Fix the Intel PT virtual LBR check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] perf test: Drop samples without an IP in the dlfilter test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] perf test: Skip the LBR inline unwinding check when unsupported Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213083@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox