Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add Type-C DP support for RK3399 EVB IND board

[Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com>]

Hi Dmitry,

On 8/2/2025 5:55 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

[...]


>> Currently, the software simply selects the first available port. So if user
>> plugs in DP dongles in both USB-C ports, the DP driver will select the first
>> port. This process is implemented in cdn_dp_connected_port() .
>>
> I think Stephen Boyd has been looking on similar issues for Chromebooks,
> which were sharing DP controller between several USB-C ports. I don't
> remember what was his last status. I think there it was easier since the
> bifurcation point was the EC.

I think the latest progress should be here: [0]. It seems that it hasn't 
been updated for a while.

[0]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240901040658.157425-1-swboyd@chromium.org/


>
> I think, CDN-DP needs to register up to two encoders and up to two
> connectors, having a separate drm_bridge chain for each of the DP
> signals paths (in the end, you can not guarantee that both branches will
> have the same simple CDN-DP -> PHY -> USB-C configuration: there can be
> different retimers, etc).
>
> Both encoders should list the same CRTC in possible_crtcs, etc. Of
> course, it should not be possible to enable both of them.
>
> This way if the user plugs in two DP dongles, it would be possible to
> select, which output actually gets a signal.

That makes sense, but this might make the DP driver quite complex. I 
will see if I can make it happen.


>
>>
>>>> BTW, one of the important things to do is to implement extcon-like
>>>> notifications. I found include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h , but if the
>>>> aux-bridge is used, the bridge chain would look like this:
>>>>
>>>> PHY0 aux-bridge ---+
>>>>                      | ----> CDN-DP bridge
>>>> PHY1 aux-bridge ---+
>>>>
>>>> Oh, CDN-DP bridge has two previous aux-bridge!
>>>>
>>>> Now, I try to use drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event() to notify HPD
>>>> state between PHY and CDN-DP controller.
>>> Does it actually work? The OOB HPD event will be repoted for the usb-c
>>> connector's fwnode, but the DP controller isn't connected to that node
>>> anyhow. If I'm not mistaken, the HPD signal will not reach DP driver in
>>> this case.
>> Yes.  What you mentioned is the case in
>> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c . I have also added a new OOB event
>> notify in the PHY driver in Patch 3, where the expected fwnode is used in
>> the PHY. So now we have two OOB HPD events, one from altmodes/displayport.c
>> and the other from PHY. Only the HPD from PHY is eventually passed to the DP
>> driver.
> This way you will loose IRQ_HPD pulse events from the DP. They are used
> by DPRX (aka DP Sink) to signal to DPTX (DP Source) that there was a
> change on the DPRX side and the DPTX should reread link params and maybe
> retrain the link.

Sorry, I still don't quite understand your point. I think the entire 
notification path is as follows:

Type-C mux callback -> RK3399 USBDP PHY -> PHY calls 
drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event() -> DP driver

Are you concerned that the IRQ_HPD event is not being handled somewhere 
along the path? Is it that the Type-C mux callback didn't notify the 
PHY, or that after the PHY passed the event to the DP driver via the OOB 
event, the DP driver didn't handle it?


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy